Advertisement

Words matter: The language of difference in human genetics

  • Mildred K. Cho
    Correspondence
    Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Mildred K. Cho, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Research Building, Stanford, CA 94305.
    Affiliations
    Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

    Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Maria Laura Duque Lasio
    Affiliations
    Division of Genetics & Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

    Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ina Amarillo
    Affiliations
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kevin Todd Mintz
    Affiliations
    Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robin L. Bennett
    Affiliations
    Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kyle B. Brothers
    Affiliations
    Norton Children’s Research Institute Affiliated with the University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.11.011

      Abstract

      Diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in academia are leading publishers and journals to re-examine their use of terminology for commonly used scientific variables. This reassessment of language is particularly important for human genetics, which is focused on identifying and explaining differences between individuals and populations. Recent guidance on the use of terms and symbols in clinical practice, research, and publications is beginning to acknowledge the ways that language and concepts of difference can be not only inaccurate but also harmful. To stop perpetuating historical wrongs, those of us who conduct and publish genetic research and provide genetic health care must understand the context of the terms we use and why some usages should be discontinued. In this article, we summarize critiques of terminology describing disability, sex, gender, race, ethnicity, and ancestry in research publications, laboratory reports, diagnostic codes, and pedigrees. We also highlight recommendations for alternative language that aims to make genetics more inclusive, rigorous, and ethically sound. Even though norms of acceptable language use are ever changing, it is the responsibility of genetics professionals to uncover biases ingrained in professional practice and training and to continually reassess the words we use to describe human difference because they cause harm to patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      ACMG Member Login

      Are you an ACMG Member? Sign in for online access.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Genetics in Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. National Research Council (US) Committee on Responsibilities of Authorship in the Biological Sciences. Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. National Academies Press (US); 2003.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022)
        • Bowker G.C.
        • Star S.L.
        Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences.
        The MIT Press, 2000: 377
        • Caswell-Jin J.L.
        • Gupta T.
        • Hall E.
        • et al.
        Racial/ethnic differences in multiple-gene sequencing results for hereditary cancer risk.
        Genet Med. 2018; 20: 234-239https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.96
        • Haffty B.G.
        • Silber A.
        • Matloff E.
        • Chung J.
        • Lannin D.
        Racial differences in the incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a cohort of early onset breast cancer patients: African American compared to White women.
        J Med Genet. 2006; 43: 133-137https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2005.034744
        • Manrai A.K.
        • Funke B.H.
        • Rehm H.L.
        • et al.
        Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 655-665https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1507092
        • Kalyanaraman Marcello R.
        • Dolle J.
        • Tariq A.
        • et al.
        Disaggregating Asian race reveals COVID-19 disparities among Asian American patients at New York City’s public hospital system.
        Public Health Rep. 2022; 137: 317-325https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549211061313
        • Ko M.
        • Ton H.
        The not underrepresented minorities: Asian Americans, diversity, and admissions.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95: 184-189https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003019
        • Mays V.M.
        • Ponce N.A.
        • Washington D.L.
        • Cochran S.D.
        Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2003; 24: 83-110https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.140927
        • Chokshi D.A.
        • Foote M.M.K.
        • Morse M.E.
        How to act upon racism—not race—as a risk factor.
        JAMA Health Forum. 2022; 3e220548https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0548
        • National Academies of Sciences
        Baker T. Bates N. Engineering, and Medicine, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Committee on Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. National Academies Press (US), 2022
      2. American Psychological Association. Bias-free language. Published 2022. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language

        • Flanagin A.
        • Frey T.
        • Christiansen S.L.
        • AMA Manual of Style Committee
        Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals.
        JAMA. 2021; 326: 621-627https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.13304
        • Howard-Peebles P.N.
        Peripatetic southern cytogenetics.
        Genet Med. 2015; 17: 425-426https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.159
        • Baynton D.
        Language matters: handicapping an affliction. Disability History Museum.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Gregg A.R.
        • Aarabi M.
        • Klugman S.
        • et al.
        Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
        Genet Med. 2021; 23 (Published correction appears in Genet Med. 2021;23(10):2015): 1793-1806
        • Dumitrescu L.
        • Ritchie M.D.
        • Brown-Gentry K.
        • et al.
        Assessing the accuracy of observer-reported ancestry in a biorepository linked to electronic medical records.
        Genet Med. 2010; 12: 648-650https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181efe2df
        • Richards S.
        • Aziz N.
        • Bale S.
        • et al.
        Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
        Genet Med. 2015; 17: 405-424https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30
        • Miller P.S.
        • Levine R.L.
        Avoiding genetic genocide: understanding good intentions and eugenics in the complex dialogue between the medical and disability communities.
        Genet Med. 2013; 15: 95-102https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.102
        • Albrecht G.L.
        • Devlieger P.J.
        The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds.
        Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48: 977-988https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00411-0
      3. U S A Congress. Public Law 111 - 256 - Rosa’s law. GovInfo. Published October 5, 2010. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-111publ256#:∼:text=An%20act%20to%20change%20references,individual%20with%20an%20intellectual%20disability

        • Nash C.
        • Hawkins A.
        • Kawchuk J.
        • Shea S.E.
        What’s in a name? Attitudes surrounding the use of the term “mental retardation”.
        Paediatr Child Health. 2012; 17: 71-74https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/17.2.71
      4. FRAXA Research Foundation. FMR1 renamed to fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1. FRAXA Research Foundation. Published April 13, 2022. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.fraxa.org/fmr1-renamed-to-fragile-x-messenger-ribonucleoprotein-1/

        • Iezzoni L.I.
        • Rao S.R.
        • Ressalam J.
        • et al.
        Physicians’ perceptions of people with disability and their health care.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2021; 40: 297-306https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01452
        • Edwards D.J.
        • Sakellariou D.
        • Anstey S.
        Barriers to, and facilitators of, access to cancer services and experiences of cancer care for adults with a physical disability: a mixed methods systematic review.
        Disabil Health J. 2020; 13100844https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100844
      5. Brown LXZ. The significance of semantics: person-first language: why it matters. Autistichoya Blog. Published August 4, 2011. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.autistichoya.com/2011/08/significance-of-semantics-person-first.html

      6. National Association of the Deaf. Community and culture – frequently asked questions. National Association of the Deaf. 2022.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Stoll K.
        • Resta R.
        ACMG carrier screening guidelines: falling short on equity and inclusion. The DNA Exchange. July 26, 2021.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Reynolds J.M.
        Three things clinicians should know about disability.
        AMA J Ethics. 2018; 20: E1181-E1187https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.1181
      7. Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives. National academies report on measuring sex, gender identity and sexual orientation. National Institutes of Health Sexual & Gender Minority Research Office. Published 2022. Updated October 28, 2022. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/sgmro

        • Kcomt L.
        • Gorey K.M.
        • Barrett B.J.
        • McCabe S.E.
        Healthcare avoidance due to anticipated discrimination among transgender people: a call to create trans-affirmative environments.
        SSM Popul Health. 2020; 11100608https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100608
        • Pratt-Chapman M.L.
        • Abon N.
        An audit of the medical pre-clinical curriculum at an urban university: sexual and gender minority health content.
        Med Educ Online. 2021; 261947172https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1947172
        • Mapes B.M.
        • Foster C.S.
        • Kusnoor S.V.
        • et al.
        Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: a scoping review.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0234962https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234962
        • Griggs J.
        • Maingi S.
        • Blinder V.
        • et al.
        American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement: strategies for reducing cancer health disparities among sexual and gender minority populations.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 2203-2208https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0441
      8. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Position Statement. Pathology testing for transgender and intersex individuals – statement of best practice for medical pathology laboratories. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published 2020. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.rcpa.edu.au/Library/College-Policies/Position-Statements/Pathology-Testing-for-Transgender-and-Intersex-Ind.aspx

      9. National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. Affirming primary care for intersex people. 2020. Published Aug. 6. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.lgbtqiahealtheducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Affirming-Primary-Care-for-Intersex-People-2020.pdf

        • Teti M.
        • Kerr S.
        • Bauerband L.A.
        • Koegler E.
        • Graves R.
        A qualitative scoping review of transgender and gender non-conforming people’s physical healthcare experiences and needs.
        Front Public Health. 2021; 9598455https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.598455
      10. Mains-Mason JB, Ufomata E, Peebles JK, et al. Knowledge retention and clinical skills acquisition in sexual and gender minority health curricula: a systematic review. Acad Med. Published online June 14, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000004768

      11. Association of American Medical Colleges. Using research to inform LGBT and DSD care. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2016.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • van Heesewijk J.
        • Kent A.
        • van de Grift T.C.
        • Harleman A.
        • Muntinga M.
        Transgender health content in medical education: a theory-guided systematic review of current training practices and implementation barriers & facilitators.
        Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022; 27: 817-846https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10112-y
      12. Das LT. We need more transgender and gender nonbinary doctors. Insights. Association of American Medical Colleges. Published September 1, 2020. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/we-need-more-transgender-and-gender-nonbinary-doctors

      13. Association of American Medical Colleges. Sexual and gender minority health resources. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2022.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
      14. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC statement on gender-affirming health care for transgender youth. Association of American Medical Colleges. Published April 9, 2021. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/aamc-statement-gender-affirming-health-care-transgender-youth

        • Dubin S.N.
        • Nolan I.T.
        • Streed Jr., C.G.
        • Greene R.E.
        • Radix A.E.
        • Morrison S.D.
        Transgender health care: improving medical students’ and residents’ training and awareness.
        Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018; 9: 377-391https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S147183
        • Desrosiers J.
        • Wilkinson T.
        • Abel G.
        • Pitama S.
        Curricular initiatives that enhance student knowledge and perceptions of sexual and gender minority groups: a critical interpretive synthesis.
        Can Med Educ J. 2016; 7: e121-e138
        • de Vries E.
        • Kathard H.
        • Müller A.
        Debate: why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?.
        BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20: 51https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6
        • McCave E.L.
        • Aptaker D.
        • Hartmann K.D.
        • Zucconi R.
        Promoting affirmative transgender health care practice within hospitals: an IPE standardized patient simulation for graduate health care learners.
        MedEdPORTAL. 2019; 1510861https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10861
        • López-Orozco C.F.
        • López-Caudana E.O.
        • Ponce P.
        A systematic mapping literature review of education around sexual and gender diversities.
        Front Sociol. 2022; 7946683https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.946683
      15. Keo-Meier C. Ehrensaft D. The Gender Affirmative Model: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Supporting Transgender and Gender Expansive Children. American Psychological Association, 2018: 3-20
        • McClure R.C.
        • Macumber C.L.
        • Kronk C.
        • et al.
        Gender harmony: improved standards to support affirmative care of gender-marginalized people through inclusive gender and sex representation.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29 (Published correction appears in J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022;29(2):411.): 354-363
        • Hughes I.A.
        • Houk C.
        • Ahmed S.F.
        • Lee P.A.
        LWPES Consensus Group, ESPE Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders.
        Arch Dis Child. 2006; 91: 554-563https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.098319
        • Johnson E.K.
        • Rosoklija I.
        • Finlayson C.
        • et al.
        Attitudes towards “disorders of sex development” nomenclature among affected individuals.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13 (608.e1-608608.e8)
      16. NewZealand Government. Tatauranga Aotearoa. Information about the Standard for Gender, Sex, and Variations of Sex Characteristics. StatsNZ. Published April 21, 2021. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.stats.govt.nz/methods/information-about-the-standard-for-gender-sex-and-variations-of-sex-characteristics

      17. Australian Press Council. Australian Press Council release guidelines for reporting on people with diverse sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics. Australian Press Council. Published November 8, 2019. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.presscouncil.org.au/media_release/australian-press-council-releases-guidelines-for-reporting-on-people-with-diverse-sexual-orientation-gender-identity-and-sex-characteristics

        • Hanauer D.A.
        • Gardner M.
        • Sandberg D.E.
        Unbiased identification of patients with disorders of sex development.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e108702https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108702
      18. World Health Organization. Gender incongruence and transgender health in the ICD. World Health Organization. 2022.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
      19. Intersex Asia Network. Joint statement on the International Classification of Diseases 11. Intersex Asia Network. Published May 23, 2019. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://intersexasia.org/joint-statement-on-the-international-classification-of-diseases-11/#:∼:text=The%20ICD-11%20introduces%20normative%20language%20to%20describe%20intersex,procedures%20that%20fail%20to%20meet%20human%20rights%20norms

      20. Council of Europe. ICD11 is a stride toward depathologisation of trans people, but more is needed. Council of Europe. May 27, 2019.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
      21. Societies for pediatric urology and American Urological Association. Pediatric decision making and differences of sex development: a societies for pediatric urology and American Urological Association joint position statement. American Urological Association. Published July 2019. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.auanet.org//about-us/policy-and-position-statements/joint-statement-on-dsd

      22. Pediatric Endocrine Society. Position statement on genital surgery in individuals with differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex traits. Pediatric Endocrine Society. Published October 20, 2020. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://pedsendo.org/clinical-resource/position-statement-on-genital-surgery-in-individuals-with-differences-of-sex-development-dsd-intersex-traits/

        • Marshall Z.
        • Welch V.
        • Minichiello A.
        • Swab M.
        • Brunger F.
        • Kaposy C.
        Documenting research with transgender, nonbinary, and other gender diverse (trans) individuals and communities: introducing the Global Trans Research Evidence Map.
        Transgender Health. 2019; 4: 68-80https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2018.0020
        • Mathew S.S.
        • Barwell J.
        • Khan N.
        • Lynch E.
        • Parker M.
        • Qureshi N.
        Inclusion of diverse populations in genomic research and health services: Genomix workshop report.
        J Community Genet. 2017; 8: 267-273https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0317-5
        • Kelley J.T.
        • McMullen-Tabry E.R.
        • Skala S.L.
        Reproductive organ pathology of individuals undergoing gender-affirming surgery.
        Surg Pathol Clin. 2022; 15: 421-434https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2022.02.013
        • Kronk C.A.
        • Everhart A.R.
        • Ashley F.
        • et al.
        Transgender data collection in the electronic health record: current concepts and issues.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29: 271-284https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab136
        • Pinto A.D.
        • Aratangy T.
        • Abramovich A.
        • et al.
        Routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data: a mixed-methods study.
        CMAJ. 2019; 191: E63-E68https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180839
        • Thompson H.M.
        • Kronk C.A.
        • Feasley K.
        • Pachwicewicz P.
        • Karnik N.S.
        Implementation of gender identity and assigned sex at birth data collection in electronic health records: where are we now?.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 6599https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126599
        • Jones N.C.
        • Otto A.K.
        • Ketcher D.E.
        • Permuth J.B.
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Schabath M.B.
        Inclusion of transgender and gender diverse health data in cancer biorepositories.
        Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020; 19100597https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100597
        • Jones T.
        Intersex studies: a systematic review of international health literature.
        SAGE Open. 2018; 8https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017745577
        • Johnson E.K.
        • Finlayson C.
        • Finney E.L.
        • et al.
        Gonadal tissue cryopreservation for children with differences of sex development.
        Horm Res Paediatr. 2019; 92: 84-91https://doi.org/10.1159/000502644
        • Amukamara A.U.
        • Amarillo I.E.
        Construction of copy number variation map identifies small regions of overlap and candidate genes for atypical female genitalia development.
        Reprod Med. 2022; 3: 160-188https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed3020014
        • Scott C.H.
        • Amarillo I.E.
        Identification of small regions of overlap from copy number variable regions in patients with hypospadias.
        Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23: 4246https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084246
        • Greene D.N.
        • McPherson G.W.
        • Rongitsch J.
        • et al.
        Hematology reference intervals for transgender adults on stable hormone therapy.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2019; 492: 84-90https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.02.011
        • Ahmad T.
        • Lafreniere A.
        • Grynspan D.
        Incorporating transition-affirming language into anatomical pathology reporting for gender affirmation surgery.
        Transgend Health. 2019; 4: 335-338https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2019.0026
        • Lott R.
        • Tunnicliffe J.
        • Sheppard E.
        • et al.
        Practical guide to specimen handling in surgical pathology. College of American Pathologists. 2020.
        (Updated July 2022. Accessed October 1, 2022.)
        • Theisen J.G.
        • Amarillo I.E.
        Creating affirmative and inclusive practices when providing genetic and genomic diagnostic and research services to gender-expansive and transgender patients.
        J Appl Lab Med. 2021; 6: 142-154https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa165
      23. Boyle P. What is gender-affirming care? Your questions answered. AAMC News. Published April 12, 2022. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/what-gender-affirming-care-your-questions-answered

        • Deutsch M.B.
        • Green J.
        • Keatley J.
        • et al.
        Electronic medical records and the transgender patient: recommendations from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health EMR Working Group.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: 700-703https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001472
        • Imborek K.L.
        • Nisly N.L.
        • Hesseltine M.J.
        • et al.
        Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: is pathology ready?.
        J Pathol Inform. 2017; 8: 42https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_52_17
        • National LGBT Health Education Center
        Ready, set, Go! A guide for collecting data on sexual orientation and gender identity. National LGBT Health Education Center.
        (Updated 2020. Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Peterson J.F.
        • Andringa P.J.
        • Grignon J.W.
        • vanTuinen P.
        The importance of communicating histories of gender assignment and reassignment to genetic laboratories.
        Genet Med. 2017; 19: 1205-1206https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.44
        • Keuroghlian A.S.
        Electronic health records as an equity tool for LGBTQIA+ people.
        Nat Med. 2021; 27: 2071-2073https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01592-3
      24. Rioux C, Paré A, London-Nadeau K, et al. Sex and gender terminology: a glossary for gender-inclusive epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. Published online June 20 2022. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219171

        • Aspinall P.J.
        The operationalization of race and ethnicity concepts in medical classification systems: issues of validity and utility.
        Health Informatics J. 2005; 11: 259-274https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458205055688
        • Barnes H.
        • Morris E.
        • Austin J.
        Trans-inclusive genetic counseling services: recommendations from members of the transgender and non-binary community.
        J Genet Couns. 2020; 29: 423-434https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1187
        • Wilson B.
        • Meyer I.
        Nonbinary LGBTQ adults in the United States.
        UCLA School of Law Williams Institute, 2021 (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Flores A.R.
        • Herman J.L.
        • Gates G.J.
        • Brown T.N.T.
        How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? UCLA School of Law Williams Institute. June 2016.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Meerwijk E.L.
        • Sevelius J.M.
        Transgender population size in the United States: a meta-regression of population-based probability samples.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: e1-e8https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303578
        • Tuite A.
        • Dalla Piazza M.
        • Brandi K.
        • Pletcher B.A.
        Beyond circles and squares: a commentary on updating pedigree nomenclature to better represent patient diversity.
        J Genet Couns. 2020; 29: 435-439https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1234
      25. Bennett RL, French KS, Resta RG, Austin J. Practice resource-focused revision: standardized pedigree nomenclature update centered on sex and gender inclusivity: a practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. Published online September 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1621

        • Bennett R.
        • French K.
        • Resta R.
        • Doyle D.
        Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: update of the recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.
        J Genet Couns. 2008; 17: 424-433https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9169-9
        • Müller-Wille S.
        Race and history: comments from an epistemological point of view.
        Sci Technol Human Values. 2014; 39: 597-606https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913517759
        • Torres J.B.
        Race, rare genetic variants, and the science of human difference in the post-genomic age.
        Transform Anthropol. 2019; 27: 37-49https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12144
        • Keel T.
        The religious pursuit of race: Christianity, modern science, and the perception of human difference.
        Harvard University, 2012 (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Moses Y.
        Why do we keep using the word “Caucasian”? Sapiens. February 1, 2017.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Roberts D.
        Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century.
        The New Press, 2012
        • Popejoy A.B.
        Too many scientists still say Caucasian.
        Nature. 2021; 596: 463https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02288-x
        • Cerdeña J.P.
        • Grubbs V.
        • Non A.L.
        Genomic supremacy: the harm of conflating genetic ancestry and race.
        Hum Genomics. 2022; 16: 18https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-022-00391-2
        • Clayborne E.P.
        Racism, not race: a physician perspective on anti-Black racism in America.
        Hastings Cent Rep. 2022; 52: S29-S31https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1365
        • Vyas D.A.
        • Eisenstein L.G.
        • Jones D.S.
        Hidden in plain sight – reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 874-882https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2004740
        • Yearby R.
        • Clark B.
        • Figueroa J.F.
        Structural racism in historical and modern US health care policy.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2022; 41: 187-194https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466
        • Yudell M.
        Race Unmasked: Biology and Race in the Twentieth Century.
        Columbia University Press, 2014
        • Down J.
        Observations on an ethnic classification of idiots.
        Lond Hosp Rep. 1866; 3: 259-262
        • Ramsay U.
        The Meaning of Mongol. BBC NEWS. November 23, 2014.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022.)
        • Jones K.
        • Jones M.
        • del Campo M.
        Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation.
        8th ed. Elsevier, 2021
        • Allen G.
        • Benda C.E.
        • Böök J.A.
        • et al.
        Mongolism. Am J Hum Genet. 1961; 1: 426
        • Sankar P.
        MEDLINE definitions of race and ethnicity and their application to genetic research.
        Nat Genet. 2003; 34 (discussion 120): 119
      26. National Institutes of Health. National Library of Medicine. NLM Technical Bulletin. What’s New for 2004 MeSH. National Institutes of Health. Published December 23, 2003. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/nd03/nd03_mesh.html

      27. United States Census Bureau. About the Hispanic population and its origin. US Department of Commerce. 2022.
        (Accessed July 1, 2022)
      28. Gonzalez-Barrera A. The ways Hispanics describe their identity vary across immigrant generations. Pew Research Center. Published September 24, 2020. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/24/the-ways-hispanics-describe-their-identity-vary-across-immigrant-generations/

        • Tallbear K.
        DNA, blood, and racializing the tribe.
        Wicazo Sa Review. 2003; 18: 81-107
        • Winker M.A.
        Measuring race and ethnicity: why and how?.
        JAMA. 2004; 292: 1612-1614https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1612
      29. National Academies of Sciences. Use of race, ethnicity, and ancestry as population descriptors in genomics research. 2022.
        (Accessed October 1, 2022.)
        • Khan A.T.
        • Gogarten S.M.
        • McHugh C.P.
        • et al.
        Recommendations on the use and reporting of race, ethnicity, and ancestry in genetic research: experiences from the NHLBI TOPMed program.
        Cell Genomics. 2022; 2100155https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100155
        • Lee S.S.J.
        • Mountain J.
        • Koenig B.
        • et al.
        The ethics of characterizing difference: guiding principles on using racial categories in human genetics.
        Genome Biol. 2008; 9: 404https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-404
      30. The Arc. Resources Directory. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://thearc.org/find-resources/.

      31. Special Olympics Center for Inclusive Health. Person First Language. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://inclusivehealth.specialolympics.org/resources/background/person-first-language

      32. Easter Seals. What is Disability Pride? Accessed December 11, 2022. https://www.easterseals.com/support-and-education/facts-about-disability/disability-pride.html

      33. American Association on Health and Disability. Disability Links. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://aahd.us/national-center-on-research/disability-links/#1594409488220-cd2784d8-fa2f

      34. National Center on Disability and Journalism. Disability Language Style Guide. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://ncdj.org/style-guide/

      35. PFLAG. National Glossary of Terms. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://pflag.org/glossary

      36. National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. LGBTQIA+ Glossary of Terms for Health Care Teams. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://www.lgbtqiahealtheducation.org/publication/lgbtqia-glossary-of-terms-for-health-care-teams/

        • Bouman W.P.
        • Schwend A.S.
        • Motmans J.
        • Smiley A.
        • Safer J.D.
        • Deutsch M.B.
        • et al.
        Language and trans health. Int J Transgend. 2017; 18: 1-6
        • Furness B.W.
        • Goldhammer H.
        • Montalvo W.
        • et al.
        Transforming primary care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: a collaborative quality improvement initiative.
        Ann Fam Med. 2020; 18: 292-302https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2542
        • Brothers K.B.
        • Bennett R.L.
        • Cho M.K.
        Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics.
        Genet Med. 2021; 23: 1004-1007https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01109-w
        • Lewis A.C.F.
        • Molina S.J.
        • Appelbaum P.S.
        • et al.
        Getting genetic ancestry right for science and society.
        Science. 2022; 376: 250-252https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7530
        • Dasgupta S.
        An Anti-Racism Toolkit for the Genetics Educator.
        Genet Med. 2020; 22: 1911-1912https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-00937-6
      37. American Society of Human Genetics. Statement by American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) President Gail Jarvik regarding research published in AJHG on evolving use of ancestry, ethnicity, and race in genetics research. American Society of Human Genetics. Published December 2, 2021. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.ashg.org/publications-news/press-releases/statement-ashg-president-gail-jarvik-regarding-research-on-evolving-use-of-ancestry-ethnicity-race-genetics-research/

      38. Panofsky A. Citizen scientific racism: White Nationalist Appropriations of Genetic Research. Paper presented at UCLA Institute for Society and Genetics; 2021. Jan. 9, Los Angeles, CA. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7csnigdKDE

      39. Stern A., Schoen J. Confronting historical harms and implications for medical genetics: eugenics in the United States. Paper presented at Association of Professors of Human Molecular Genetics Annual Meeting; April 28, 2022. Palm Springs, CA. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.aphmg.org/agenda-2022

      40. Donohue C., Green E., Turda M., et al. The meaning of eugenics: historical and present-day discussions of eugenics and scientific racism. Conference hosted by National Human Genome Research Institute; Dec. 2-3, 2021. Rockville, MD. Accessed July 1, 2022.