Advertisement

Response to Li and Sun

  • Lucinda Freeman
    Correspondence
    Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Lucinda Freeman, Graduate School of Health, University of New South Wales, UTS, 100 Broadway, Ultimo, New South Wales 2008, Kensington Campus, Australia.
    Affiliations
    School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

    Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Martin B. Delatycki
    Affiliations
    Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jackie Leach Scully
    Affiliations
    Disability Innovation Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Edwin P. Kirk
    Affiliations
    School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

    Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

    NSW Health Pathology East Genomics, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 14, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.10.003
      We thank Li and Sun for their interest in our paper
      • Freeman L.
      • Righetti S.
      • Delatycki M.B.
      • Scully J.L.
      • Kirk E.P.
      The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: a systematic review.
      and their comments. We agree with the authors that views regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting may be influenced by the access to accurate risk information and genetic counseling and that both of these together with access to testing itself may differ in cost depending on the health care system.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      ACMG Member Login

      Are you an ACMG Member? Sign in for online access.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Genetics in Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Freeman L.
        • Righetti S.
        • Delatycki M.B.
        • Scully J.L.
        • Kirk E.P.
        The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: a systematic review.
        Genet Med. 2022; 24: 1803-1813https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.05.005
        • Abe S.
        • Noguchi Y.
        • Kitamura K.
        What do patients with hereditary deafness think of genetic studies?.
        Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010; 37: 422-426https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2009.12.007
        • Withrow K.A.
        • Tracy K.A.
        • Burton S.K.
        • et al.
        Impact of genetic advances and testing for hearing loss: results from a national consumer survey.
        Am J Med Genet A. 2009; 149A: 1159-1168https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32800

      Linked Article