Advertisement

An accessible, relational, inclusive, and actionable (ARIA) model of genetic counseling compared with usual care: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Published:September 01, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.025

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Effective approaches to communicate genomic information are needed to ensure equitable care. In a randomized controlled superiority trial, we tested a novel practice model that aims to make genetic counseling inclusive, by making the communication accessible, relational, and actionable (ARIA).

      Methods

      In total, 696 English- and Spanish-speaking patients aged 18 to 49 years, enriched for individuals from historically underserved backgrounds, were randomized in 1:1 ratio to ARIA or usual care. Primary outcomes were accuracy of recall, communication satisfaction, and perceived understanding. In total, 33 participants completed qualitative interviews.

      Results

      Recall and understanding were high for all participants. ARIA participants scored higher on the relationship scale of communication satisfaction (mean difference = 0.09, 95% CI = <0.01 to 0.17). Moderator analyses of communication satisfaction showed that those with lower health literacy reported less communication difficulty in ARIA and those using medical interpreters reported greater communication ease in ARIA. No significant difference was found on other primary and secondary outcomes. Qualitative data enhanced understanding of how and why ARIA can be effective.

      Conclusion

      This study provides evidence that a genetic counseling intervention that focuses on specific communication skills to enhance relationship-building, patient engagement, and comprehension can be effective with all patients and may be especially valuable for patients of lower health literacy and Spanish-speakers who use a medical interpreter.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      ACMG Member Login

      Are you an ACMG Member? Sign in for online access.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Genetics in Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bernhardt B.A.
        Chapter 8. Genetic counseling and genomic sequencing. In: Tibben A, Biesecker BB, eds. Clinical Genome Sequencing. Academic Press; 2019:125-142.
        • Hurle B.
        • Citrin T.
        • Jenkins J.F.
        • et al.
        What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report.
        Genet Med. 2013; 15: 658-663https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.14
        • Joseph G.
        • Pasick R.J.
        • Schillinger D.
        • Luce J.
        • Guerra C.
        • Cheng J.K.Y.
        Information mismatch: cancer risk counseling with diverse underserved patients. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(5):1090-1104. Published correction appears in.
        J Genet Couns. 2017; 26: 1105https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0089-4
        • Ellington L.
        • Maxwel A.
        • Baty B.J.
        • Roter D.
        • Dudley W.N.
        • Kinney A.Y.
        Genetic counseling communication with an African American BRCA1 kindred.
        Soc Sci Med. 2007; 64: 724-734https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.017
        • Roter D.
        • Ellington L.
        • Erby L.H.
        • Larson S.
        • Dudley W.
        The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice.
        Am J Med Genet C. 2006; 142C: 209-220https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30094
        • Roter D.L.
        • Erby L.H.
        • Larson S.
        • Ellington L.
        Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: preliminary test of a conceptual framework.
        Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65: 1442-1457https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.033
        • Biesecker B.
        Genetic counseling and the central tenets of practice.
        Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020; 10: a038968https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a038968
        • Cheng J.K.Y.
        • Guerra C.
        • Pasick R.J.
        • Schillinger D.
        • Luce J.
        • Joseph G.
        Cancer genetic counseling communication with low-income Chinese immigrants.
        J Community Genet. 2018; 9: 263-276https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0350-4
        • Kamara D.
        • Weil J.
        • Youngblom J.
        • Guerra C.
        • Joseph G.
        Cancer counseling of low-income limited English proficient Latina women using medical interpreters: implications for shared decision-making.
        J Genet Couns. 2018; 27: 155-168https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0132-5
        • Lara-Otero K.
        • Weil J.
        • Guerra C.
        • Cheng J.K.Y.
        • Youngblom J.
        • Joseph G.
        Genetic counselor and healthcare interpreter perspectives on the role of interpreters in cancer genetic counseling.
        Health Commun. 2019; 34: 1608-1618https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1514684
        • Kessler S.
        Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IX. Teaching and counseling.
        J Genet Couns. 1997; 6: 287-295https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025676205440
        • Ellington L.
        • Kelly K.M.
        • Reblin M.
        • Latimer S.
        • Roter D.
        Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing.
        Health Commun. 2011; 26: 667-675https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.561921
        • Schaa K.L.
        • Roter D.L.
        • Biesecker B.B.
        • Cooper L.A.
        • Erby L.H.
        Genetic counselors’ implicit racial attitudes and their relationship to communication.
        Health Psychol. 2015; 34: 111-119https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000155
        • Epstein R.M.
        • Street Jr., R.L.
        Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute; 2007. NIH Publication 07-6225. Accessed August 24, 2022.
        • Riddle L.
        • Amendola L.M.
        • Gilmore M.J.
        • et al.
        Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: the ARIA model.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2021; 104: 969-978https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.017
        • Mittendorf K.F.
        • Kauffman T.L.
        • Amendola L.M.
        • et al.
        Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): a clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021;106:106432. Published correction appears in.
        Contemp Clin Trials. 2022; 114106682https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432
        • Amendola L.M.
        • Berg J.S.
        • Horowitz C.R.
        • et al.
        The clinical sequencing evidence-generating research consortium: integrating genomic sequencing in diverse and medically underserved populations.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2018; 103: 319-327https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007
        • Daly M.B.
        • Pal T.
        • Berry M.P.
        • et al.
        Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19: 77-102https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001
        • Weitzel J.N.
        • Lagos V.I.
        • Cullinane C.A.
        • et al.
        Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer.
        JAMA. 2007; 297: 2587-2595https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.23.2587
        • Amendola L.M.
        • Shuster E.
        • Leo M.C.
        • et al.
        Laboratory-related outcomes from integrating an accessible delivery model for hereditary cancer risk assessment and genetic testing in populations with barriers to access.
        Genet Med. 2022; 24: 1196-1205https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.006
        • Goddard K.A.B.
        • Angelo F.A.N.
        • Ackerman S.L.
        • et al.
        Lessons learned about harmonizing survey measures for the CSER consortium.
        J Clin Transl Sci. 2020; 4: 537-546https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.41
        • Rose A.
        • Peters N.
        • Shea J.A.
        • Armstrong K.
        The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States.
        J Health Commun. 2005; 10: 309-321https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590950039
      1. Strauss A. Corbin J.M. Grounded Theory in Practice. Sage Publications, Inc, 1997
        • Haun J.
        • Noland-Dodd V.
        • Varnes J.
        • Graham-Pole J.
        • Rienzo B.
        • Donaldson P.
        Testing the BRIEF Health Literacy Screening Tool.
        Fed Pract. 2009; 26: 24-31
        • Athens B.A.
        • Caldwell S.L.
        • Umstead K.L.
        • Connors P.D.
        • Brenna E.
        • Biesecker B.B.
        A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess outcomes of genetic counseling.
        J Genet Couns. 2017; 26: 902-933https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0082-y
        • McCarthy Veach P.
        • LeRoy B.S.
        • Callanan N.P.
        Structuring genetic counseling sessions: initiating, contracting, ending, and referral.
        in: McCarthy Veach P. LeRoy B.S. Callanan N.P. Facilitating the Genetic Counseling Process: Practice-Based Skills. Springer International Publishing, 2018: 139-172
        • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
        AHRQ health literacy universal precautions toolkit. ARHQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Published July 2019. Accessed February 24, 2020.
        • Riddle L.
        • Karliner L.S.
        • Livaudais-Toman J.
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of an exome sequencing training course for medical interpreters.
        Per Med. 2022; 19: 125-138https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2021-0091
        • de Leon A.
        • McCarthy Veach P.
        • Bro D.
        • LeRoy B.S.
        Spanish language concordance in genetic counseling sessions in the United States: counselor experiences and perceptions of its effects on processes and outcomes.
        J Genet Couns. 2022; 31: 188-205https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1472
        • Alcalá H.E.
        • Albert S.L.
        • Trabanino S.K.
        • et al.
        Access to and use of health care services among Latinos in East Los Angeles and Boyle Heights.
        Fam Community Health. 2016; 39: 62-71https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000090
        • Biesecker B.B.
        • Lillie S.E.
        • Amendola L.M.
        • et al.
        A review and definition of “usual care” in genetic counseling trials to standardize use in research.
        J Genet Couns. 2021; 30: 42-50https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1363
        • Biesecker B.B.
        • Lewis K.L.
        • Biesecker L.G.
        Web-based platform vs genetic counselors in educating patients about carrier results from exome sequencing-reply.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 999https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2236
        • McCuaig J.M.
        • Armel S.R.
        • Care M.
        • Volenik A.
        • Kim R.H.
        • Metcalfe K.A.
        Next-generation service delivery: a scoping review of patient outcomes associated with alternative models of genetic counseling and genetic testing for hereditary cancer.
        Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10: 435https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10110435
        • Pierle J.M.
        • Mahon S.M.
        Genetic service delivery models: exploring approaches to care for families with hereditary cancer risk.
        Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2019; 23: 60-67https://doi.org/10.1188/19.CJON.60-67
        • Schmidlen T.
        • Schwartz M.
        • DiLoreto K.
        • Kirchner H.L.
        • Sturm A.C.
        Patient assessment of chatbots for the scalable delivery of genetic counseling.
        J Genet Couns. 2019; 28: 1166-1177https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1169
        • Hindorff L.A.
        • Bonham V.L.
        • Brody L.C.
        • et al.
        Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research.
        Nat Rev Genet. 2018; 19: 175-185https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.89