Advertisement

2022 Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics (APHMG) consensus–based update of the core competencies for undergraduate medical education in genetics and genomics

Published:August 30, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.014

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The field of genetics and genomics continues to expand at an unprecedented pace. As scientific knowledge is translated to clinical practice, genomic information is routinely being used in preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic decision-making across a variety of clinical practice areas. As adoption of genomic medicine further evolves, health professionals will be required to stay abreast of new genetic discoveries and technologies and implementation of these advances within their scope of practice will be indicated.

      Methods

      The Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics previously developed medical school genetics core competencies, last updated in 2013. The competencies were reviewed and updated through a structured approach incorporating a modified Delphi method.

      Results

      The updated Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics core competencies are presented. Current revisions include competencies that are concise, specific, and assessable. In addition, they incorporate recent advances in clinical practice and promote equity and inclusion in clinical care.

      Conclusion

      The 2022 competencies will serve as a guide for medical school leadership and educators involved in curriculum development, implementation, and assessment. Use of these competencies across the undergraduate medical curricula will foster knowledge, skills, and behaviors required in medical practice across a wide range of specialties.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      ACMG Member Login

      Are you an ACMG Member? Sign in for online access.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Genetics in Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Frenk J.
        • Chen L.
        • Bhutta Z.A.
        • et al.
        Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.
        Lancet. 2010; 376: 1923-1958https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5
        • Friedman J.M.
        • Blitzer M.
        • Elsas II, L.J.
        • Francke U.
        • Willard H.F.
        Clinical objectives in medical genetics for undergraduate medical students. Association of Professors of Human Genetics, Clinical Objectives Task Force.
        Genet Med. 1998; 1: 54-55https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-199811000-00013
        • Hyland K.M.
        • Dasgupta S.
        • Garber K.
        • et al.
        Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics medical school core curriculum in genetics 2013. Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics.
        • Core Competency Working Group of the National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics
        Recommendations of core competencies in genetics essential for all health professionals.
        Genet Med. 2001; 3: 155-159https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200103000-00011
      1. Association of American Medical Colleges. Report VI. Contemporary issues in medicine: genetics education. June 2004. https://www.aamc.org/media/24221/download?attachment

        • Tognetto A.
        • Michelazzo M.B.
        • Ricciardi W.
        • Federici A.
        • Boccia S.
        Core competencies in genetics for healthcare professionals: results from a literature review and a Delphi method.
        BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19: 19https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1456-7
        • Glinton K.E.
        • Potocki L.
        • Dhar S.U.
        An innovative medical school curriculum to enhance exposure to genetics and genomics: updates and outcomes.
        Genet Med. 2022; 24: 722-728https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.017
        • Korf B.R.
        • Berry A.B.
        • Limson M.
        • et al.
        Framework for development of physician competencies in genomic medicine: report of the Competencies Working Group of the Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Physician Education in Genomics.
        Genet Med. 2014; 16: 804-809https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.35
        • Batalden P.
        • Leach D.
        • Swing S.
        • Dreyfus H.
        • Dreyfus S.
        General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21: 103-111https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.103
        • Englander R.
        • Cameron T.
        • Ballard A.J.
        • Dodge J.
        • Bull J.
        • Aschenbrener C.A.
        Toward a common taxonomy of competency domains for the health professions and competencies for physicians.
        Acad Med. 2013; 88: 1088-1094https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a3b2b
        • Haspel R.L.
        • Genzen J.R.
        • Wagner J.
        • Fong K.
        Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Working Group, Wilcox RL. Call for improvement in medical school training in genetics: results of a national survey.
        Genet Med. 2021; 23: 1151-1157https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01100-5
        • White S.
        • Jacobs C.
        • Phillips J.
        Mainstreaming genetics and genomics: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators for nurses and physicians in secondary and tertiary care.
        Genet Med. 2020; 22: 1149-1155https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0785-6
        • Kaye C.
        • Korf B.
        Genetic literacy and competency.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 132: S224-S230https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1032G
        • Wilcox R.L.
        • Adem P.V.
        • Afshinnekoo E.
        • et al.
        The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era.
        Pers Med. 2018; 15: 199-208https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2017-0077
        • Dasgupta S.
        • Feldman G.L.
        • Powell C.M.
        • et al.
        Training the next generation of genomic medicine providers: trends in medical education and national assessment.
        Genet Med. 2020; 22: 1718-1722https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0855-9
        • Hyland K.
        • Garber K.
        • Dasgupta S.
        From helices to health: undergraduate medical education in genetics and genomics.
        Pers Med. 2019; 16: 211-220https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2018-0081
        • Slade D.
        PARP and PARG inhibitors in cancer treatment.
        Genes Dev. 2020; 34: 360-394https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.334516.119
        • Franceschini G.
        • Di Leone A.
        • Terribile D.
        • Sanchez M.A.
        • Masetti R.
        Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know.
        Ann Ital Chir. 2019; 90: 1-2
        • Tanakaya K.
        Current clinical topics of Lynch syndrome.
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2019; 24: 1013-1019https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1282-7
        • Musunuru K.
        • Hershberger R.E.
        • Day S.M.
        • et al.
        Genetic testing for inherited cardiovascular diseases: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020; 13e000067https://doi.org/10.1161/HCG.0000000000000067
        • Cernat A.
        • Hayeems R.Z.
        • Ungar W.J.
        Cascade health service use in family members following genetic testing in children: a scoping literature review.
        Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29: 1601-1610https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00952-4
        • Doran GT. There’s a S.M.A.R.T
        way to write management’s goals and objectives.
        Manag Rev. 1981; 70: 35-36
        • Miller G.E.
        The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.
        Acad Med. 1990; 65: S63-S67https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
        • Bloom B.S.
        Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals.
        David McKay Company, Inc, 1956
      2. Anderson L.W. Krathwohl D.R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson, 2001
        • Adams N.E.
        Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives.
        J Med Libr Assoc. 2015; 103: 152-153https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
        • Lee K.
        How do we move forward on the social determinants of health: the global governance challenges.
        Crit Public Health. 2010; 20: 5-14https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590903563573
        • Marmot M.
        • Friel S.
        • Bell R.
        • Houweling T.A.
        • Taylor S.
        • Commission on Social Determinants of Health
        Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.
        Lancet. 2008; 372: 1661-1669https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6
        • Braveman P.
        • Arkin E.
        • Orleans T.
        • Proctor D.
        • Acker J.
        • Plough A.
        What is health equity?.
        Behav Sci Policy. 2018; 4: 1-14
        • Plamondon K.M.
        A tool to assess alignment between knowledge and action for health equity.
        BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 224https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8324-6
        • Braveman P.
        Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27: 167-194https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103
        • Dalkey N.
        • Helmer O.
        An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts.
        Manag Sci. 1963; 9: 458-467
        • Bachmann C.
        • Abramovitch H.
        • Barbu C.G.
        • et al.
        A European consensus on learning objectives for a core communication curriculum in health care professions.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 93: 18-26https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.016
        • Hsu C.C.
        • Sandford B.A.
        The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus.
        Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007; 12: 10
        • Jünger S.
        • Payne S.A.
        • Brine J.
        • Radbruch L.
        • Brearley S.G.
        Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.
        Palliat Med. 2017; 31: 684-706https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690685
        • Guglielmi G.
        Facing up to injustice in genome science.
        Nature. 2019; 568: 290-293https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01166-x
        • Mills M.C.
        • Rahal C.
        The GWAS Diversity Monitor tracks diversity by disease in real time.
        Nat Genet. 2020; 52: 242-243https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-0580-y
        • Sheehan E.
        • Bennett R.L.
        • Harris M.
        • Chan-Smutko G.
        Assessing transgender and gender non-conforming pedigree nomenclature in current genetic counselors’ practice: the case for geometric inclusivity.
        J Genet Couns. 2020; 29: 1114-1125https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1256
        • Bennett R.L.
        • French K.S.
        • Resta R.G.
        • Doyle D.L.
        Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: update and assessment of the recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.
        J Genet Couns. 2008; 17: 424-433https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9169-9