Advertisement
Systematic Review| Volume 24, ISSUE 5, P971-985, May 2022

Worldwide prevalence of Lynch syndrome in patients with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Nadine Abu-Ghazaleh
    Correspondence
    Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Nadine Abu-Ghazaleh. Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 South, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Department of Colorectal Cancer and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Varun Kaushik
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Department of Colorectal Cancer and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Alexandra Gorelik
    Affiliations
    Department of Colorectal Cancer and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mark Jenkins
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Finlay Macrae
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Department of Colorectal Cancer and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 14, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.014

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, with an estimated prevalence of 2% to 3% of CRC. A prevalence study is needed to provide accurate estimates of the true prevalence of LS.

      Methods

      MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Prevalence was calculated by random effects meta-analysis models. I2 score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Meta-regression was performed for between-study variance.

      Results

      A total of 51 studies were included in this review. The overall pooled yield of LS screening was 2.2% based on all methods of detection. Studies performing germline tests on all participants with CRC reported higher prevalence (5.1%) as opposed to studies only performing germline tests on participants with tumors with mismatch repair deficiency (1.6%) or microsatellite instability (1.1%). Selected cohorts of CRC had a higher prevalence of germline LS diagnoses.

      Conclusion

      LS prevalence across multiple ethnic, geographic, and clinical populations is remarkably similar. Universal germline testing of patients presenting with cancer identifies that most CRCs are attributed to LS. Young patients presenting with CRC and those who fulfill criteria for a familial risk provide the highest returns for LS identification. Our study supports the universal germline CRC screening for LS.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      ACMG Member Login

      Are you an ACMG Member? Sign in for online access.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Genetics in Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lynch H.T.
        • Lynch P.M.
        • Lanspa S.J.
        • Snyder C.L.
        • Lynch J.F.
        • Boland C.R.
        Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications.
        Clin Genet. 2009; 76: 1-18https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01230.x
        • Loomans-Kropp H.A.
        • Umar A.
        Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults.
        J Cancer Epidemiol. 2019; 20199841295https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9841295
        • Lamberti C.
        • Kruse R.
        • Ruelfs C.
        • et al.
        Microsatellite instability-a useful diagnostic tool to select patients at high risk for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a study in different groups of patients with colorectal cancer.
        Gut. 1999; 44: 839-843https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.44.6.839
        • Hampel H.
        • Stephens J.A.
        • Pukkala E.
        • et al.
        Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.
        Gastroenterology. 2005; 129: 415-421https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.011
        • Hampel H.
        • de la Chapelle A.
        How do we approach the goal of identifying everybody with Lynch syndrome?.
        Fam Cancer. 2013; 12: 313-317https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9611-5
        • Watson P.
        • Riley B.
        The tumor spectrum in the Lynch syndrome.
        Fam Cancer. 2005; 4: 245-248https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-004-7994-z
        • de la Chapelle A.
        2002 William Allan Award address. Inherited human diseases: victories, challenges, disappointments.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 72: 236-240https://doi.org/10.1086/346215
        • Vasen H.F.A.
        • Blanco I.
        • Aktan-Collan K.
        • et al.
        Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts.
        Gut. 2013; 62: 812-823https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304356
        • Benson 3rd, A.B.
        • Venook A.P.
        • Cederquist L.
        • et al.
        Colon Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15: 370-398https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0036
        • Giardiello F.M.
        • Allen J.I.
        • Axilbund J.E.
        • et al.
        Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer.
        Gastroenterology. 2014; 147: 502-526https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.001
        • Munn Z.
        • Moola S.
        • Lisy K.
        • Riitano D.
        • Tufanaru C.
        Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-06
        • Moher D.
        • Shamseer L.
        • Clarke M.
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
        Syst Rev. 2015; 4: 1https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
      1. InSiGHT Variant Databases Governance Committee Terms of Reference. International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours. https://www.insight-group.org/content/uploads/2018/06/VDGC_ToR.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2021.

        • ClinVar
        National Center for Biotechnology Information.
        (Accessed May 30, 2021.)
        • Umar A.
        • Boland C.R.
        • Terdiman J.P.
        • et al.
        Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96: 261-268https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh034
        • Vasen H.F.
        • Watson P.
        • Mecklin J.P.
        • Lynch H.T.
        New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC.
        Gastroenterology. 1999; 116: 1453-1456https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70510-x
        • Brennan B.
        • Hemmings C.T.
        • Clark I.
        • Yip D.
        • Fadia M.
        • Taupin D.R.
        Universal molecular screening does not effectively detect Lynch syndrome in clinical practice.
        Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017; 10: 361-371https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17690990
        • Buchanan D.D.
        • Clendenning M.
        • Rosty C.
        • et al.
        Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 32: 427-438https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13468
        • Schofield L.
        • Grieu F.
        • Amanuel B.
        • et al.
        Population-based screening for Lynch syndrome in Western Australia.
        Int J Cancer. 2014; 135: 1085-1091https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28744
        • Southey M.C.
        • Jenkins M.A.
        • Mead L.
        • et al.
        Use of molecular tumor characteristics to prioritize mismatch repair gene testing in early-onset colorectal cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 6524-6532https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.671
        • Ward R.L.
        • Turner J.
        • Williams R.
        • et al.
        Routine testing for mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer is justified.
        J Pathol. 2005; 207: 377-384https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1851
        • Spaepen M.
        • Vankeirsbilck B.
        • Van Opstal S.
        • et al.
        Germline mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 mismatch repair genes in Belgian hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) patients.
        Fam Cancer. 2006; 5: 179-189https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-005-5958-6
        • Green R.C.
        • Parfrey P.S.
        • Woods M.O.
        • Younghusband H.B.
        Prediction of Lynch syndrome in consecutive patients with colorectal cancer.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 331-340https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn499
        • Woods M.O.
        • Younghusband H.B.
        • Parfrey P.S.
        • et al.
        The genetic basis of colorectal cancer in a population-based incident cohort with a high rate of familial disease.
        Gut. 2010; 59: 1369-1377https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.208462
        • Jiang W.
        • Cai M.Y.
        • Li S.Y.
        • et al.
        Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in a large consecutive cohort of Chinese colorectal cancer patients: high prevalence and unique molecular features.
        Int J Cancer. 2019; 144: 2161-2168https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32044
        • Yan H.L.
        • Hao L.Q.
        • Jin H.Y.
        • et al.
        Clinical features and mismatch repair genes analyses of Chinese suspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a cost-effective screening strategy proposal.
        Cancer Sci. 2008; 99: 770-780https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00737.x
        • Porkka N.
        • Lahtinen L.
        • Ahtiainen M.
        • et al.
        Epidemiological, clinical and molecular characterization of Lynch-like syndrome: A population-based study.
        Int J Cancer. 2019; 145: 87-98https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32085
        • Canard G.
        • Lefevre J.H.
        • Colas C.
        • et al.
        Screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer: are we doing enough?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19: 809-816https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2014-7
        • Julié C.
        • Trésallet C.
        • Brouquet A.
        • et al.
        Identification in daily practice of patients with Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer): revised Bethesda guidelines-based approach versus molecular screening.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103 (quiz 2836.): 2825-2835
        https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02084.x
        • Kraus C.
        • Rau T.T.
        • Lux P.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive screening for mutations associated with colorectal cancer in unselected cases reveals penetrant and nonpenetrant mutations.
        Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: E559-E568https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29149
        • Lamberti C.
        • Mangold E.
        • Pagenstecher C.
        • et al.
        Frequency of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer among unselected patients with colorectal cancer in Germany.
        Digestion. 2006; 74: 58-67https://doi.org/10.1159/000096868
        • Haraldsdottir S.
        • Rafnar T.
        • Frankel W.L.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive population-wide analysis of Lynch syndrome in Iceland reveals founder mutations in MSH6 and PMS2.
        Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 14755https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14755
        • O’Kane G.M.
        • Ryan É.
        • McVeigh T.P.
        • et al.
        Screening for mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer: data from three academic medical centers.
        Cancer Med. 2017; 6: 1465-1472https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1025
        • Urso E.
        • Agostini M.
        • Pucciarelli S.
        • et al.
        Clinical and molecular detection of inherited colorectal cancers in northeast Italy: a first prospective study of incidence of Lynch syndrome and MUTYH-related colorectal cancer in Italy.
        Tumour Biol. 2012; 33: 857-864https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-011-0312-0
        • Suzuki O.
        • Eguchi H.
        • Chika N.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and clinicopathologic/molecular characteristics of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer in the under-50-year-old Japanese population.
        Surg Today. 2017; 47: 1135-1146https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1486-x
        • Chika N.
        • Eguchi H.
        • Kumamoto K.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of Lynch syndrome and Lynch-like syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer in a Japanese hospital-based population.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47 (Published correction appears in Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017;47(2):191.): 108-117
        https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyw200
        • Furukawa T.
        • Konishi F.
        • Shitoh K.
        • Kojima M.
        • Nagai H.
        • Tsukamoto T.
        Evaluation of screening strategy for detecting hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.
        Cancer. 2002; 94: 911-920https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10332
        • Kumamoto K.
        • Ishida H.
        • Suzuki O.
        • et al.
        Lower prevalence of Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients in a Japanese hospital-based population.
        Surg Today. 2016; 46: 713-720https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1232-1
        • Terui H.
        • Tachikawa T.
        • Kakuta M.
        • et al.
        Molecular and clinical characteristics of MSH6 germline variants detected in colorectal cancer patients.
        Oncol Rep. 2013; 30: 2909-2916https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2781
        • Moufid F.Z.
        • Bouguenouch L.
        • El Bouchikhi I.
        • Houssaini M.I.
        • Ouldim K.
        Molecular and presymptomatic analysis of a Moroccan Lynch syndrome family revealed a novel frameshift MLH1 germline mutation.
        Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018; 29: 701-704https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.17761
        • Niessen R.C.
        • Berends M.J.W.
        • Wu Y.
        • et al.
        Identification of mismatch repair gene mutations in young patients with colorectal cancer and in patients with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.
        Gut. 2006; 55: 1781-1788https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.090159
        • Alqahtani M.
        • Edwards C.
        • Buzzacott N.
        • et al.
        Screening for Lynch syndrome in young Saudi colorectal cancer patients using microsatellite instability testing and next generation sequencing.
        Fam Cancer. 2018; 17: 197-203https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-0015-9
        • Siraj A.K.
        • Prabhakaran S.
        • Bavi P.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of Lynch syndrome in a Middle Eastern population with colorectal cancer.
        Cancer. 2015; 121: 1762-1771https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29288
        • Berginc G.
        • Bracko M.
        • Ravnik-Glavac M.
        • Glavac D.
        Screening for germline mutations of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 genes in Slovenian colorectal cancer patients: implications for a population specific detection strategy of Lynch syndrome.
        Fam Cancer. 2009; 8: 421-429https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9258-4
        • Ravnik-Glavac M.
        • Potocnik U.
        • Glavac D.
        Incidence of germline hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutations (HNPCC patients) among newly diagnosed colorectal cancers in a Slovenian population.
        J Med Genet. 2000; 37: 533-536https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.37.7.533
        • Jeong S.Y.
        • Shin K.H.
        • Shin J.H.
        • et al.
        Microsatellite instability and mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes in sporadic colorectal cancers.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 1069-1077https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-7282-x
        • Musulén E.
        • Sanz C.
        • Muñoz-Mármol A.M.
        • Ariza A.
        Mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry: a useful population screening strategy for Lynch syndrome.
        Hum Pathol. 2014; 45: 1388-1396https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2014.02.012
        • Pérez-Carbonell L.
        • Ruiz-Ponte C.
        • Guarinos C.
        • et al.
        Comparison between universal molecular screening for Lynch syndrome and revised Bethesda guidelines in a large population-based cohort of patients with colorectal cancer.
        Gut. 2012; 61: 865-872https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300041
        • Piñol V.
        • Castells A.
        • Andreu M.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 1986-1994https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.16.1986
        • Zumstein V.
        • Vinzens F.
        • Zettl A.
        • et al.
        Systematic immunohistochemical screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer: a single centre experience of 486 patients.
        Swiss Med Wkly. 2016; 146: w14315https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2016.14315
        • Chang S.C.
        • Lin P.C.
        • Yang S.H.
        • Wang H.S.
        • Liang W.Y.
        • Lin J.K.
        Taiwan hospital-based detection of Lynch syndrome distinguishes 2 types of microsatellite instabilities in colorectal cancers.
        Surgery. 2010; 147: 720-728https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.069
        • Kurzawski G.
        • Suchy J.
        • Lener M.
        • et al.
        Germline MSH2 and MLH1 mutational spectrum including large rearrangements in HNPCC families from Poland (update study).
        Clin Genet. 2006; 69: 40-47https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00550.x
        • Barnetson R.A.
        • Tenesa A.
        • Farrington S.M.
        • et al.
        Identification and survival of carriers of mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes in colon cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2751-2763https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa053493
        • Cunningham J.M.
        • Kim C.Y.
        • Christensen E.R.
        • et al.
        The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 69 (Published correction appears in Am J Hum Genet 2001;69(5):1160.): 780-790
        https://doi.org/10.1086/323658
        • Erten M.Z.
        • Fernandez L.P.
        • Ng H.K.
        • et al.
        Universal versus targeted screening for Lynch syndrome: comparing ascertainment and costs based on clinical experience.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61: 2887-2895https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4218-y
        • Hampel H.
        • Frankel W.L.
        • Martin E.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 5783-5788https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5950
        • Hampel H.
        • Frankel W.L.
        • Martin E.
        • et al.
        Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1851-1860https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043146
        • Hunter J.E.
        • Zepp J.M.
        • Gilmore M.J.
        • et al.
        Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers.
        Cancer. 2015; 121: 3281-3289https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29470
        • Kidambi T.D.
        • Blanco A.
        • Myers M.
        • Conrad P.
        • Loranger K.
        • Terdiman J.P.
        Selective versus universal screening for Lynch syndrome: a six-year clinical experience.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60: 2463-2469https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3234-z
        • Lee J.
        • Xiao Y.Y.
        • Sun Y.Y.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and characteristics of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome in immigrant Asian colorectal cancer patients.
        BMC Cancer. 2017; 17: 843https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3799-y
        • Marquez E.
        • Geng Z.
        • Pass S.
        • et al.
        Implementation of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in university and safety-net health system settings: successes and challenges.
        Genet Med. 2013; 15: 925-932https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.45
        • Pearlman R.
        • Frankel W.L.
        • Swanson B.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and spectrum of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer.
        JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 464-471https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5194
        • Samowitz W.S.
        • Curtin K.
        • Lin H.H.
        • et al.
        The colon cancer burden of genetically defined hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.
        Gastroenterology. 2001; 121: 830-838https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2001.27996
        • Yearsley M.
        • Hampel H.
        • Lehman A.
        • Nakagawa H.
        • de la Chapelle A.
        • Frankel W.L.
        Histologic features distinguish microsatellite-high from microsatellite-low and microsatellite-stable colorectal carcinomas, but do not differentiate germline mutations from methylation of the MLH1 promoter.
        Hum Pathol. 2006; 37: 831-838https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2006.02.009
        • Yurgelun M.B.
        • Kulke M.H.
        • Fuchs C.S.
        • et al.
        Cancer susceptibility gene mutations in individuals with colorectal cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 1086-1095https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0012
        • Win A.K.
        • Jenkins M.A.
        • Dowty J.G.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and penetrance of major genes and polygenes for colorectal cancer.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017; 26: 404-412https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0693
        • Moreira L.
        • Balaguer F.
        • Lindor N.
        • et al.
        Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer.
        JAMA. 2012; 308: 1555-1565https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.13088
        • Ladabaum U.
        • Wang G.
        • Terdiman J.
        • et al.
        Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 69-79https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00002
        • Pearlman R.
        • Frankel W.L.
        • Swanson B.J.
        • et al.
        Prospective statewide study of universal screening for hereditary colorectal cancer: the Ohio colorectal cancer prevention initiative.
        JCO Precis Oncol. 2021; 5PO.20.00525https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00525
        • Hampel H.
        • Pearlman R.
        • Beightol M.
        • et al.
        Assessment of tumor sequencing as a replacement for Lynch syndrome screening and current molecular tests for patients with colorectal cancer.
        JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4 (Published correction appears in JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(6):891.): 806-813
        https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0104