Phenotype based prediction of exome sequencing outcome using machine learning for neurodevelopmental disorders

References

1. • Vissers L.E.
   • de Ligt J.
   • Gilissen C.
   • et al.
   A de novo paradigm for mental retardation.
   Nat Genet. 2010; 42: 1109-1112https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.712
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • De Ligt J.
   • Willemsen M.H.
   • van Bon B.W.
   • et al.
   Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability.
   N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1921-1929https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1206524
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Stojanovic J.R.
   • Miletic A.
   • Peterlin B.
   • et al.
   Diagnostic and clinical utility of clinical exome sequencing in children with moderate and severe global developmental delay / intellectual disability.
   J Child Neurol. 2020; 35: 116-131https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073819879835
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Gilissen C.
   • Hehir-Kwa J.Y.
   • Thung D.T.
   • et al.
   Genome sequencing identifies major causes of severe intellectual disability.
   Nature. 2014; 511: 344-347https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13394
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Retterer K.
   • Juusola J.
   • Cho M.T.
   • et al.
   Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications.
   Genet Med. 2016; 18: 696-704https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.148
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Robinson P.N.
   • Köhler S.
   • Bauer S.
   • Seelow D.
   • Horn D.
   • Mundlos S.
   The human phenotype ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease.
   Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 83: 610-615https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.09.017
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Feenstra I.
   • Hanemaaijer N.
   • Sikkema-Raddatz B.
   • Yntema H.
   • et al.
   Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis.
   Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19: 1152-1160https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2011.120
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • de Vries B.B.
   • White S.M.
   • Knight S.J.
   • et al.
   Clinical studies on submicroscopic subtelomeric rearrangements: a checklist.
   J Med Genet. 2001; 38: 145-150https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.38.3.145
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Gubbels C.S.
   • VanNoy G.E.
   • Madden J.A.
   • et al.
   Prospective, phenotype-driven selection of critically ill neonates for rapid exome sequencing is associated with high diagnostic yield.
   Genet. Med. 2020; 22: 736-744https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0708-6
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Robinson P.N.
    • Köhler S.
    • Oellrich A.
    • et al.
    Improved exome prioritization of disease genes through cross-species phenotype comparison.
    Genome Res. 2014; 24: 340-348https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.160325.113
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Franke A.
    • Wollstein A.
    • Teuber M.
    • et al.
    GENOMIZER: an integrated analysis system for genome-wide association data.
    Hum Mutat. 2006; 27: 583-588https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20306
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Manders P.
    • Lutomski J.E.
    • Smit C.
    • Swinkels D.W.
    • Zielhuis G.A.
    The Radboud Biobank: a central facility for disease-based biobanks to optimise use and distribution of biomaterial for scientific research in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
    Open J Bioresour. 2018; 5: 2https://doi.org/10.5334/ojb.36
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Haer-Wigman L.
    • van Zelst-Stams W.A.
    • Pfundt R.
    • et al.
    Diagnostic exome sequencing in 266 dutch patients with visual impairment.
    Eur J Hum Genet. 2017; 25: 591-599https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2017.9
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar

14. Bell J, Bodmer D, Sistermans E, Ramsden S. Practice guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of unclassified variants (UVs) in clinical molecular genetics. 2007.

    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Richards S.
    • Aziz N.
    • Bale S.
    • et al.
    Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the association for molecular pathology.
    Genet Med. 2015; 17: 405-424https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Brier G.W.
    Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability.
    Mon Weather Rev. 1950; 78: 1-3https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Nick T.G.
    • Campbell K.M.
    Logistic regression.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2007; 404: 273-301https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_14
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Meurer W.J.
    • Tolles J.
    Logistic regression diagnostics: understanding how well a model predicts outcomes.
    JAMA. 2017; 317: 1068-1069https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.20441
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Salvatier J.
    • Wiecki T.V.
    • Fonnesbeck C.
    Probabilistic programming in python using PyMC3.
    PeerJ Comput Sci. 2016; 2: e55https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.55
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Carpenter B.
    • Gelman A.
    • Hoffman M.D.
    • et al.
    Stan: a probabilistic programming language.
    J Stat Softw. 2017; 76: 1-32https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Piironen J.
    • Vehtari A.
    Sparsity information and regularization in the horseshoe and other shrinkage priors.
    Electron J Statist. 2017; 11: 5018-5051https://doi.org/10.1214/17-EJS1337SI
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • van Erp S.
    • Oberski D.L.
    • Mulder J.
    Shrinkage priors for bayesian penalized regression.
    J Math Psychol. 2019; 89: 31-50https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.12.004
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Cortes C.
    • Vapnik V.
    Support-vector networks.
    Mach Learn. 1995; 20: 273-297https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Singh G.
    • Gupta R.
    • Rastogi A.
    • Chandel M.D.S.
    • Ahmad R.
    A machine learning approach for detection of fraud based on svm.
    Int J Sci Eng Technol. 2012; 1: 192-196
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Huang S.
    • Cai N.
    • Pacheco P.P.
    • Narrandes S.
    • Wang Y.
    • Xu W.
    Applications of support vector machine (SVM) learning in cancer genomics.
    Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2018; 15: 41-51https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20063
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Gurovich Y.
    • Hanani Y.
    • Omri B.
    • et al.
    Identifying facial phenotypes of genetic disorders using deep learning.
    Nat Med. 2019; 25: 60-64https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0279-0
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Dudding-Byth T.
    • Baxter A.
    • Holliday E.G.
    • et al.
    Computer face-matching technology using two-dimensional photographs accurately matches the facial gestalt of unrelated individuals with the same syndromic form of intellectual disability.
    BMC Biotechnol. 2017; 17: 90https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0410-1
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Ferry Q.
    • Steinberg J.
    • Webber C.
    • et al.
    Diagnostically relevant facial gestalt information from ordinary photos.
    eLife. 2014; 3: e02020https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02020
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Dingemans A.J.M.
    • Stremmelaar D.E.
    • van der Donk R.
    • et al.
    Quantitative facial phenotyping for koolen-de vries and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
    Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29: 1418-1423https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00824-x
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Bou Assi E.
    • Gagliano L.
    • Rihana S.
    • Nguyen D.K.
    • Sawan M.
    Bispectrum features and multilayer perceptron classifier to enhance seizure prediction.
    Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 15491https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33969-9
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Fujita T.
    • Sato A.
    • Narita A.
    • et al.
    Use of a multilayer perceptron to create a prediction model for dressing independence in a small sample at a single facility.
    J Phys Ther Sci. 2019; 31: 69-74https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.69
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Needell D.
    • Saab Rayan
    • Woolf T.
    Simple classification using binary data.
    J Mach Learn Res. 2018; 19: 2487-2516
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Pedregosa F.
    • Varoquaux G.
    • Gramfort A.
    • et al.
    Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python.
    J Mach Learn Res. 2011; 12: 2825-2830
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Bergstra J.
    • Komer B.
    • Eliasmith C.
    • Yamins D.
    • Cox D.D.
    Hyperopt: a python library for model selection and hyperparameter optimization.
    Comput Sci Disc. 2015; 8: 014008
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Hoffman M.D.
    • Gelman A.
    The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.
    J Mach Learn Res. 2014; 15: 1593-1623
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Wright C.F.
    • Fitzgerald T.W.
    • Jones W.D.
    • et al.
    Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.
    Lancet. 2015; 385: 1305-1314https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61705-0
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • McGrother C.W.
    • Bhaumik S.
    • Thorp C.F.
    • Hauck A.
    • Branford D.
    • Watson J.M.
    Epilepsy in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, associations and service implications.
    Seizure. 2006; 15: 376-386https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2006.04.002
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Zhou J.
    • Park C.Y.
    • Theesfeld C.L.
    • et al.
    Whole-genome deep-learning analysis identifies contribution of noncoding mutations to autism risk.
    Nat Genet. 2019; 51: 973-980https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0420-0
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Werling D.M.
    • Brand H.
    • An J.Y.
    • et al.
    An analytical framework for whole-genome sequence association studies and its implications for autism spectrum disorder.
    Nat Genet. 2018; 50: 727-736https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0107-y
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Dingemans A.J.M.
    • Stremmelaar Diante E.
    • Vissers L.E.L.M.
    • et al.
    Human disease genes website series: An international, open and dynamic library for up-to-date clinical information.
    Am J Med Genet A. 2021; 185: 1039-1046https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.62057
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar