x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- secondary findingsRemove secondary findings filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2013 and 2020.
Author
- Kalia, Sarah S2
- Korf, Bruce R2
- Martin, Christa L2
- Miller, David T2
- Ormond, Kelly E2
- Adelman, Kathy1
- Bale, Sherri J1
- Berg, Jonathan S1
- Biesecker, Leslie G1
- Chao, Elizabeth1
- Chung, Wendy K1
- Eng, Christine1
- Esplin, Edward D1
- Evans, James P1
- Green, Robert C1
- Grody, Wayne W1
- Herman, Gail E1
- Hufnagel, Sophia B1
- Klein, Teri E1
- Li, Marilyn M1
- McGuire, Amy L1
- McKelvey, Kent D1
- Nathanson, Katherine L1
- Nussbaum, Robert L1
- O'Daniel, Julianne M1
Keyword
- incidental findings2
- ACMG 561
- ACMG SF v2.01
- exome sequencing1
- genetic testing1
- genome1
- genome sequencing1
- genomic medicine1
- next-generation sequencing (NGS)1
- personalized medicine1
- population screening1
- presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPV)1
- sequencing1
- somatic variants1
- tumor testing1
- whole exome1
- whole genome1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
4 Results
- ACMG StatementOpen Archive
Points to consider for reporting of germline variation in patients undergoing tumor testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 22Issue 7p1142–1148Published in issue: July, 2020- Marilyn M. Li
- Elizabeth Chao
- Edward D. Esplin
- David T. Miller
- Katherine L. Nathanson
- Sharon E. Plon
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 43The sequencing of tumor-derived DNA to identify tumor-specific variations (biomarkers) with potential diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive therapeutic implications (hereafter, “tumor testing”) is a prominent example of precision medicine. Although the primary goal of this testing is the identification of biomarkers to guide patient management, testing tumor genomes also has the potential to uncover clinically relevant germline variation that is associated with heritable cancer susceptibility and other conditions, and carrier status for autosomal recessive disorders, if confirmed to be present in the germline. - ACMG StatementOpen Archive
The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 21Issue 7p1467–1468Published in issue: July, 2019- ACMG Board of Directors
Cited in Scopus: 40The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has previously published policy statements on the reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing (ACMG SF v1.0 and ACMG SF v2.0), also known as the “ACMG 56” and “ACMG 59,” respectively.1,2 These recommendations specifically stated that “reporting some incidental [a.k.a. secondary] findings would likely have medical benefit for the patients and families of patients undergoing clinical sequencing” (ACMG board’s emphasis). - ACMG StatementOpen Archive
Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 19Issue 2p249–255Published in issue: February, 2017- Sarah S. Kalia
- Kathy Adelman
- Sherri J. Bale
- Wendy K. Chung
- Christine Eng
- James P. Evans
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1159Disclaimer: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical services. Adherence to these recommendations is completely voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 15Issue 7p565–574Published in issue: July, 2013- Robert C. Green
- Jonathan S. Berg
- Wayne W. Grody
- Sarah S. Kalia
- Bruce R. Korf
- Christa L. Martin
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1871In clinical exome and genome sequencing, there is a potential for the recognition and reporting of incidental or secondary findings unrelated to the indication for ordering the sequencing but of medical value for patient care. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recently published a policy statement on clinical sequencing that emphasized the importance of alerting the patient to the possibility of such results in pretest patient discussions, clinical testing, and reporting of results.