x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- genetic testingRemove genetic testing filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2002 and 2020.
Author
- Prior, Thomas W4
- Pletcher, Beth A3
- Miller, David T2
- ACMG Board Of Directors1
- Adelman, Kathy1
- Agnese, Doreen1
- Alford, Raye L1
- Allitto, Bernice1
- Amos, Jean1
- Anderson, Rebecca R1
- Arnos, Kathleen S1
- Bale, Sherri J1
- Bayrak-Toydemir, Pinar1
- Bean, Lora1
- Bird, Thomas1
- Bocian, Maureen1
- Braastad, Corey1
- Bradley, Linda A1
- Burke, Wylie1
- Butson, Melissa Barber1
- Carlston, Colleen M1
- Catania, Jennifer Williamson1
- Chung, Wendy K1
- Conlin, Laura1
- Daly, Mary1
Keyword
- carrier screening2
- genetic counseling2
- genotype2
- guideline2
- newborn screening2
- phenotype2
- spinal muscular atrophy2
- Alzheimer disease1
- Balanced rearrangement1
- BRCA11
- BRCA21
- breast cancer1
- Carrier screening1
- CFTR1
- Chromosomal microarray1
- CTG repeats1
- Deaf1
- FMR11
- Jewish genetic diseases1
- OTC1
- SMN11
- SMN21
- UPD1
- X-linked mental retardation1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
16 Results
- ACMG StatementOpen Archive
Points to consider: is there evidence to support BRCA1/2 and other inherited breast cancer genetic testing for all breast cancer patients? A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 22Issue 4p681–685Published in issue: April, 2020- Tuya Pal
- Doreen Agnese
- Mary Daly
- Albert La Spada
- Jennifer Litton
- Myra Wick
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 18Of all cancers that develop in women in the United States, breast cancer has the highest incidence, regardless of race or ethnicity, with an estimated 271,270 new cases and 42,260 deaths during 2019.1 Approximately 5–10% of breast cancers are estimated to result from hereditary causes, the majority of which are attributed to pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes, although other variants in genes such as PALB2, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, CHEK2, and ATM contribute. - ACMG Technical StandardsOpen Archive
Diagnostic gene sequencing panels: from design to report—a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 22Issue 3p453–461Published in issue: March, 2020- Lora Bean
- Birgit Funke
- Colleen M. Carlston
- Jennifer L. Gannon
- Sibel Kantarci
- Bryan L. Krock
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 53Gene sequencing panels are a powerful diagnostic tool for many clinical presentations associated with genetic disorders. Advances in DNA sequencing technology have made gene panels more economical, flexible, and efficient. Because the genes included on gene panels vary widely between laboratories in gene content (e.g., number, reason for inclusion, evidence level for gene–disease association) and technical completeness (e.g., depth of coverage), standards that address technical and clinical aspects of gene panels are needed. - ACMG Practice ResourceOpen Archive
Yield of additional genetic testing after chromosomal microarray for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disability and congenital anomalies: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 20Issue 10p1105–1113Published in issue: October, 2018- Darrel Waggoner
- Karen E. Wain
- Adrian M. Dubuc
- Laura Conlin
- Scott E. Hickey
- Allen N. Lamb
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 33Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is recommended as the first-tier test in evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disability and congenital anomalies. CMA may not detect balanced cytogenomic abnormalities or uniparental disomy (UPD), and deletion/duplications and regions of homozygosity may require additional testing to clarify the mechanism and inform accurate counseling. We conducted an evidence review to synthesize data regarding the benefit of additional testing after CMA to inform a genetic diagnosis. - ACMG StatementOpen Archive
Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 19Issue 2p249–255Published in issue: February, 2017- Sarah S. Kalia
- Kathy Adelman
- Sherri J. Bale
- Wendy K. Chung
- Christine Eng
- James P. Evans
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1133Disclaimer: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical services. Adherence to these recommendations is completely voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. - ACMG-Policy-StatementOpen Archive
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a revised position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 18Issue 2p207–208Published in issue: February, 2016- ACMG Board of Directors
Cited in Scopus: 54Disclaimer: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health-care providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services. Adherence to these recommendations does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, geneticists and other clinicians should apply their own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. - ACMG Practice GuidelinesOpen Archive
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss
Genetics in MedicineVol. 16Issue 4p347–355Published in issue: April, 2014- Raye L. Alford
- Kathleen S. Arnos
- Michelle Fox
- Jerry W. Lin
- Christina G. Palmer
- Arti Pandya
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 162Hearing loss is a common and complex condition that can occur at any age, can be inherited or acquired, and is associated with a remarkably wide array of etiologies. The diverse causes of hearing loss, combined with the highly variable and often overlapping presentations of different forms of hearing loss, challenge the ability of traditional clinical evaluations to arrive at an etiologic diagnosis for many deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. However, identifying the etiology of a hearing loss may affect clinical management, improve prognostic accuracy, and refine genetic counseling and assessment of the likelihood of recurrence for relatives of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children
Genetics in MedicineVol. 15Issue 3p234–245Published in issue: March, 2013- Laine Friedman Ross
- Howard M. Saal
- Karen L. David
- Rebecca R. Anderson
- the American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Cited in Scopus: 307The genetic testing and genetic screening of children are commonplace. Decisions about whether to offer genetic testing and screening should be driven by the best interest of the child. The growing literature on the psychosocial and clinical effects of such testing and screening can help inform best practices. This technical report provides ethical justification and empirical data in support of the proposed policy recommendations regarding such practices in a myriad of settings.Genet Med 2013:15(3):234–245 - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Technical standards and guidelines for spinal muscular atrophy testing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 13Issue 7p686–694Published in issue: July, 2011- Thomas W. Prior
- Narasimhan Nagan
- Elaine A. Sugarman
- Sat v. De Batish
- Corey Braastad
Cited in Scopus: 65Spinal muscular atrophy is a common autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron (SMN1) gene, affecting approximately 1 in 10,000 live births. The disease is characterized by progressive symmetrical muscle weakness resulting from the degeneration and loss of anterior horn cells in the spinal cord and brainstem nuclei. The disease is classified on the basis of age of onset and clinical course. Two almost identical SMN genes are present on 5q13: the SMN1 gene, which is the spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene, and the SMN2 gene. - ACMG Practice GuidelinesOpen Archive
Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: Joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors
Genetics in MedicineVol. 13Issue 6p597–605Published in issue: June, 2011- Jill S. Goldman
- Susan E. Hahn
- Jennifer Williamson Catania
- Susan Larusse-Eckert
- Melissa Barber. Butson
- Malia Rumbaugh
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 236Alzheimer disease is the most common cause of dementia. It occurs worldwide and affects all ethnic groups. The incidence of Alzheimer disease is increasing due, in part, to increased life expectancy and the aging baby boomer generation. The average lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer disease is 10–12%. This risk at least doubles with the presence of a first-degree relative with the disorder. Despite its limited utility, patients express concern over their risk and, in some instances, request testing. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Technical standards and guidelines for myotonic dystrophy type 1 testing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 11Issue 7p552–555Published in issue: July, 2009- Thomas W. Prior
- on behalf of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee
Cited in Scopus: 26Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is an autosomal dominant multisystem condition. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is the result of an unstable CTG expansion in the 3′-untranslated region of the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase gene. The age of onset and the severity of the phenotype are roughly correlated with the size of the CTG expansion. The combination of Southern transfer and polymerase chain reaction provides an accurate means of identifying patients affected by myotonic dystrophy type 1. This document follows the outline format of the general Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories. - ACMG-Practice-GuidelinesOpen Archive
Carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy
Genetics in MedicineVol. 10Issue 11p840–842Published in issue: November, 2008- Thomas W. Prior
- for the Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee
Cited in Scopus: 184The autosomal recessive disorder proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA, MIM #253300) is a severe neuromuscular disease characterized by degeneration of alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord, which results in progressive proximal muscle weakness and paralysis. SMA is the second most common fatal autosomal recessive disorder after cystic fibrosis, with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 10,000 live births and a carrier frequency of 1/40–1/60. Childhood SMA is subdivided into three clinical groups on the basis of age of onset and clinical course: type I SMA (Werdnig-Hoffmann) is characterized by severe, generalized muscle weakness and hypotonia at birth or within the first 3 months. - ACMG-Practice-GuidelinesOpen Archive
Carrier screening in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent
Genetics in MedicineVol. 10Issue 1p54–56Published in issue: January, 2008- Susan J. Gross
- Beth A. Pletcher
- Kristin G. Monaghan
- for the Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee
Cited in Scopus: 163This guideline is designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health care providers to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to this guideline does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. This guideline should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. - ACMG Practice GuidelinesOpen Archive
Preconception and prenatal testing of biologic fathers for carrier status
Genetics in MedicineVol. 8Issue 2p134–135Published in issue: February, 2006- Beth A. Pletcher
- Maureen Bocian
Cited in Scopus: 11Disclaimer: This guideline is designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health care providers to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to this guideline does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. This guideline should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Fragile X syndrome: Diagnostic and carrier testing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 7Issue 8p584–587Published in issue: October, 2005- Stephanie Sherman
- Beth A. Pletcher
- Deborah A. Driscoll
Cited in Scopus: 229Disclaimer: This guideline is designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health care providers to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to this guideline does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. This guideline should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Standards and Guidelines for CFTR Mutation Testing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 4Issue 5p379–391Published in issue: September, 2002- Carolyn Sue Richards
- Linda A. Bradley
- Jean Amos
- Bernice Allitto
- Wayne W. Grody
- Anne Maddalena
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 107One mission of the ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance (QA) Committee is to develop standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, including cytogenetics, biochemical, and molecular genetics specialties. This document was developed under the auspices of the Molecular Subcommittee of the Laboratory QA Committee by the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Working Group. It was placed on the “fast track” to address the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical quality assurance practices of laboratories currently providing testing for CF. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Genetics Evaluation Guidelines for the Etiologic Diagnosis of Congenital Hearing Loss
Genetics in MedicineVol. 4Issue 3p162–171Published in issue: May, 2002- Genetic Evaluation of Congenital Hearing Loss Expert Panel
Cited in Scopus: 128The advent of hearing screening in newborns in many states has led to an increase in the use of genetic testing and related genetic services in the follow-up of infants with hearing loss. A significant proportion of those with congenital hearing loss have genetic etiologies underlying their hearing loss. To ensure that those identified with congenital hearing loss receive the genetic services appropriate to their conditions, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services Administration funded the American College of Medical Genetics to convene an expert panel to develop guidelines for the genetic evaluation of congential hearing loss.