x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- Down syndromeRemove Down syndrome filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2005 and 2022.
Author
- Malinowski, Jennifer2
- McDowell, Geraldine A2
- Palomaki, Glenn E2
- Akkari, Yassmine MN1
- Barrie, Elizabeth S1
- Best, Robert G1
- Bradley, Linda A1
- Canick, Jacob A1
- Darilek, Sandra1
- Donnenfeld, Alan E1
- Dungan, Jeffrey S1
- Erwin, Angelika1
- Jenkins, Gabrielle P1
- Klugman, Susan1
- LaGrave, Danielle1
- Lee, Jo Ellen S1
- Leung, Marco L1
- McClain, Monica R1
- Monaghan, Kristin G1
- Rose, Nancy C1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
4 Results
- ACMG Practice Guideline
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 25Issue 2100336Published online: December 16, 2022- Jeffrey S. Dungan
- Susan Klugman
- Sandra Darilek
- Jennifer Malinowski
- Yassmine M.N. Akkari
- Kristin G. Monaghan
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 3This workgroup aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for pregnant individuals at general risk for fetal trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 and to evaluate the utility of NIPS for other chromosomal disorders. - ACMG Systematic Evidence Review
Systematic evidence-based review: The application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies
Genetics in MedicineVol. 24Issue 7p1379–1391Published online: May 24, 2022- Nancy C. Rose
- Elizabeth S. Barrie
- Jennifer Malinowski
- Gabrielle P. Jenkins
- Monica R. McClain
- Danielle LaGrave
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 7Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in high-risk populations. This systematic evidence review evaluates NIPS performance in a general-risk population. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Technical standards and guidelines: Prenatal screening for Down syndrome that includes first-trimester biochemistry and/or ultrasound measurements
Genetics in MedicineVol. 11Issue 9p669–681Published in issue: September, 2009- Glenn E. Palomaki
- Jo Ellen S. Lee
- Jacob A. Canick
- Geraldine A. McDowell
- Alan E. Donnenfeld
- for the ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee
Cited in Scopus: 37This statement is intended to augment the current general ACMG Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories and to address guidelines specific to first-trimester screening for Down syndrome. The aim is to provide the laboratory the necessary information to ensure accurate and reliable Down syndrome screening results given a screening protocol (e.g., combined first trimester and integrated testing). Information about various test combinations and their expected performance are provided, but other issues such as availability of reagents, patient interest in early test results, access to open neural tube defect screening, and availability of chorionic villus sampling are all contextual factors in deciding which screening protocol(s) will be selected by individual health care providers. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Technical standards and guidelines: Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: This new section on “Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome,” together with the new section on “Prenatal Screening for Open Neural Tube Defects,” replaces the previous Section H of the American College of Medical Genetics Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories
Genetics in MedicineVol. 7Issue 5p344–354Published in issue: May, 2005- Glenn E. Palomaki
- Linda A. Bradley
- Geraldine A. McDowell
- Down Syndrome Working Group
- ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee
Cited in Scopus: 17This statement is intended to augment the current general American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories and to address validation guidelines specific to second trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome. Individual laboratories are responsible for meeting the CLIA/CAP quality assurance standards with respect to appropriate sample documentation, assay validation, general proficiency, and quality control measures.