x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- Lyon, ElaineRemove Lyon, Elaine filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2008 and 2022.
Author
- Bale, Sherri2
- Das, Soma2
- Grody, Wayne W2
- Hegde, Madhuri R2
- Monaghan, Kristin G2
- Palomaki, Glenn E2
- Pratt, Victoria M2
- Rehm, Heidi L2
- Scott, Stuart A2
- Spector, Elaine2
- Watson, Michael S2
- Aziz, Nazneen1
- Bale, Sherri J1
- Bayrak-Toydemir, Pinar1
- Behlmann, Andrea1
- Bellissimo, Daniel B1
- Berg, Jonathan S1
- Bick, David1
- Brown, Kerry K1
- Deignan, Joshua L1
- Doyle, Debra L1
- Flockhart, David A1
- Foster, Julie Gastier1
- Friez, Michael J1
Keyword
- clinical genetic testing2
- pharmacogenetics2
- ACMG1
- ACMG laboratory guideline1
- ACMG practice guideline1
- Clinical testing1
- coumadin1
- CYP2CP1
- CYP2D61
- exome sequencing1
- FMR11
- fragile X syndrome1
- genome sequencing1
- guidelines1
- hypercoagulation1
- interpretation1
- interpretation and reporting1
- laboratory guidelines1
- next-generation sequencing1
- Pharmacogene1
- Pharmacogenetic1
- Pharmacogenomic1
- Pharmacogenomic nomenclature1
- Southern blot analysis1
- VKORC11
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
9 Results
- ACMG Technical Standard
Clinical pharmacogenomic testing and reporting: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 24Issue 4p759–768Published online: February 10, 2022- Marwan K. Tayeh
- Andrea Gaedigk
- Matthew P. Goetz
- Teri E. Klein
- Elaine Lyon
- Gwendolyn A. McMillin
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 5Pharmacogenomic testing interrogates germline sequence variants implicated in interindividual drug response variability to infer a drug response phenotype and to guide medication management for certain drugs. Specifically, discrete aspects of pharmacokinetics, such as drug metabolism, and pharmacodynamics, as well as drug sensitivity, can be predicted by genes that code for proteins involved in these pathways. Pharmacogenomics is unique and differs from inherited disease genetics because the drug response phenotype can be drug-dependent and is often unrecognized until an unexpected drug reaction occurs or a patient fails to respond to a medication. - ACMG StatementOpen Archive
DNA-based screening and population health: a points to consider statement for programs and sponsoring organizations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 23Issue 6p989–995Published in issue: June, 2021- Michael F. Murray
- Monica A. Giovanni
- Debra L. Doyle
- Steven M. Harrison
- Elaine Lyon
- Kandamurugu Manickam
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 24A comment to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01141-w . - ACMG Technical StandardOpen Archive
Laboratory testing for fragile X, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 23Issue 5p799–812Published in issue: May, 2021- Elaine Spector
- Andrea Behlmann
- Kathryn Kronquist
- Nancy C. Rose
- Elaine Lyon
- Honey V. Reddi
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 12Molecular genetic testing of the FMR1 gene is commonly performed in clinical laboratories. Pathogenic variants in the FMR1 gene are associated with fragile X syndrome, fragile X–associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), and fragile X–associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI). This document provides updated information regarding FMR1 pathogenic variants, including prevalence, genotype–phenotype correlations, and variant nomenclature. Methodological considerations are provided for Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of FMR1, including triplet repeat–primed and methylation-specific PCR. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
Genetics in MedicineVol. 17Issue 5p405–424Published in issue: May, 2015- Sue Richards
- Nazneen Aziz
- Sherri Bale
- David Bick
- Soma Das
- Julie Gastier-Foster
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 14980Disclaimer: These ACMG Standards and Guidelines were developed primarily as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines is voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These Standards and Guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. - ACMG Practice GuidelinesOpen Archive
ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 15Issue 9p733–747Published in issue: September, 2013- Heidi L. Rehm
- Sherri J. Bale
- Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir
- Jonathan S. Berg
- Kerry K. Brown
- Joshua L. Deignan
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 677Next-generation sequencing technologies have been and continue to be deployed in clinical laboratories, enabling rapid transformations in genomic medicine. These technologies have reduced the cost of large-scale sequencing by several orders of magnitude, and continuous advances are being made. It is now feasible to analyze an individual’s near-complete exome or genome to assist in the diagnosis of a wide array of clinical scenarios. Next-generation sequencing technologies are also facilitating further advances in therapeutic decision making and disease prediction for at-risk patients. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
ACMG Standards and Guidelines for fragile X testing: a revision to the disease-specific supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 15Issue 7p575–586Published in issue: July, 2013- Kristin G. Monaghan
- Elaine Lyon
- Elaine B. Spector
Cited in Scopus: 114Molecular genetic testing of the FMR1 gene is commonly performed in clinical laboratories. Mutations in the FMR1 gene are associated with fragile X syndrome, fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome, and premature ovarian insufficiency. This document provides updated information regarding FMR1 gene mutations, including prevalence, genotype–phenotype correlation, and mutation nomenclature. Methodological considerations are provided for Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction amplification of the FMR1 gene, including triplet repeat–primed and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Laboratory testing of CYP2D6 alleles in relation to tamoxifen therapy
Genetics in MedicineVol. 14Issue 12p990–1000Published in issue: December, 2012- Elaine Lyon
- Julie Gastier Foster
- Glenn E. Palomaki
- Victoria M. Pratt
- Kristen Reynolds
- M. Fernanda Sábato
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 33Tamoxifen, a widely prescribed drug for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer, is metabolized to more potent metabolites by the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme. Variants in the CYP2D6 gene can cause patients to be either intermediate or poor metabolizers, thereby rendering tamoxifen treatment less effective. Testing for CYP2D6 gene variants is available in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified clinical laboratories; however, the biological complexity of the variants makes result interpretation and phenotype prediction challenging. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007
Genetics in MedicineVol. 10Issue 4p294–300Published in issue: April, 2008- C. Sue Richards
- Sherri Bale
- Daniel B. Bellissimo
- Soma Das
- Wayne W. Grody
- Madhuri R. Hegde
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 637ACMG previously developed recommendations for standards for interpretation of sequence variations. We now present the updated revised recommendations. Here, we describe six interpretative categories of sequence variations: (1) sequence variation is previously reported and is a recognized cause of the disorder; (2) sequence variation is previously unreported and is of the type which is expected to cause the disorder; (3) sequence variation is previously unreported and is of the type which may or may not be causative of the disorder; (4) sequence variation is previously unreported and is probably not causative of disease; (5) sequence variation is previously reported and is a recognized neutral variant; and (6) sequence variation is previously not known or expected to be causative of disease, but is found to be associated with a clinical presentation. - ACMG-Policy-StatementOpen Archive
Pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 alleles for warfarin
Genetics in MedicineVol. 10Issue 2p139–150Published in issue: February, 2008- David A. Flockhart
- Dennis O'Kane
- Marc S. Williams
- Michael S. Watson
- David A. Flockhart
- Brian Gage
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 188American College of Medical Genetics statements and guidelines are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health care professionals to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines does not necessarily ensure a successful medical outcome. These statements and guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.