x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- Hirsch, BetsyRemove Hirsch, Betsy filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2001 and 2019.
Author
- Mascarello, James T3
- Rao, Kathleen W3
- Cooley, Linda D2
- Kearney, Hutton M2
- Wolff, Daynna J2
- Beaudet, Arthur L1
- Biegel, Jaclyn A1
- Brothman, Arthur1
- Brothman, Arthur R1
- David, Karen L1
- Desnick, Robert J1
- Dubuc, Adrian M1
- Grier, Robert E1
- Horner, Vanessa L1
- Jacky, Peter1
- Jacky, Peter B1
- Ketterling, Rhett P1
- Levy, Brynn1
- Maddalena, Anne1
- Martin, Christa Lese1
- McDowell, Geraldine A1
- McGinniss, Matthew J1
- Mikhail, Fady M1
- Newman, Scott1
Keyword
- cancer2
- fluorescence in situ hybridization2
- guidelines2
- acquired variants1
- array comparative genomic hybridization1
- BAC1
- chromosomal microarray1
- chromosome1
- consanguinity1
- copy number1
- copy-number abnormalities1
- cytogenetics1
- FISH1
- fluorescence1
- homozygosity1
- hybridization1
- interpretation1
- laboratory guideline1
- microarray1
- oligonucleotide1
- single nucleotide polymorphism1
- solid tumor1
- standards1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
6 Results
- ACMG Technical StandardsOpen Archive
Technical laboratory standards for interpretation and reporting of acquired copy-number abnormalities and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity in neoplastic disorders: a joint consensus recommendation from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 21Issue 9p1903–1916Published in issue: September, 2019- Fady M. Mikhail
- Jaclyn A. Biegel
- Linda D. Cooley
- Adrian M. Dubuc
- Betsy Hirsch
- Vanessa L. Horner
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 23The detection of acquired copy-number abnormalities (CNAs) and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in neoplastic disorders by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has significantly increased over the past few years with respect to both the number of laboratories utilizing this technology and the broader number of tumor types being assayed. This highlights the importance of standardizing the interpretation and reporting of acquired variants among laboratories. To address this need, a clinical laboratory-focused workgroup was established to draft recommendations for the interpretation and reporting of acquired CNAs and CN-LOH in neoplastic disorders. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: standards and guidelines for documenting suspected consanguinity as an incidental finding of genomic testing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 15Issue 2p150–152Published in issue: February, 2013- Catherine W. Rehder
- Karen L. David
- Betsy Hirsch
- Helga V. Toriello
- Carolyn M. Wilson
- Hutton M. Kearney
Cited in Scopus: 74Genomic testing, including single-nucleotide polymorphism–based microarrays and whole-genome sequencing, can detect long stretches of the genome that display homozygosity. The presence of these segments, when distributed across multiple chromosomes, can indicate a familial relationship between the proband’s parents. This article describes the detection of possible consanguinity by genomic testing and the factors confounding the inference of a specific parental relationship. It is designed to guide the documentation of suspected consanguinity by clinical laboratory professionals and to alert laboratories to the need to establish a reporting policy in conjunction with their ethics review committee and legal counsel. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Section E9 of the American College of Medical Genetics technical standards and guidelines: Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Genetics in MedicineVol. 13Issue 7p667–675Published in issue: July, 2011- James T. Mascarello
- Betsy. Hirsch
- Hutton M. Kearney
- Rhett P. Ketterling
- Susan B. Olson
- Denise I. Quigley
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 51This updated Section E9 has been incorporated into and supersedes the previous Section E9 in Section E: Clinical Cytogenetics of the 2008 Edition (Revised 02/2007) American College of Medical Genetics Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories. This section deals specifically with the standards and guidelines applicable to fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Section E6.5 of the ACMG technical standards and guidelines: Chromosome studies for solid tumor abnormalities
Genetics in MedicineVol. 11Issue 12p890–897Published in issue: December, 2009- Linda D. Cooley
- James T. Mascarello
- Betsy Hirsch
- Peter B. Jacky
- P. Nagesh Rao
- Debra Saxe
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 3Cytogenetic analysis of tumor tissue detects clonal abnormalities. The information obtained from these studies is utilized for diagnosis, prognosis, and patient management. - ACMG Standards and GuidelinesOpen Archive
Microarray analysis for constitutional cytogenetic abnormalities
Genetics in MedicineVol. 9Issue 9p654–662Published in issue: September, 2007- Lisa G. Shaffer
- Arthur L. Beaudet
- Arthur R. Brothman
- Betsy Hirsch
- Brynn Levy
- Christa Lese Martin
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 62This guideline is designed primarily as an educational resource for health care providers to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to this guideline does not necessarily ensure a successful medical outcome. This guideline should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Technical Standards and Guidelines for Fragile X: The First of a Series of Disease-Specific Supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical Genetics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 3Issue 3p200–205Published in issue: May, 2001- Anne Maddalena
- Carolyn Sue Richards
- Matthew J McGinniss
- Arthur Brothman
- Robert J Desnick
- Robert E Grier
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 205Preface: The Quality Assurance subcommittee of the ACMG Laboratory Practice committee has the mission of maintaining high technical standards for the performance and interpretation of genetic tests. In part, this is accomplished by the publication of the document “Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories,” which was published in its second edition in 1999 and is now maintained online (see http://www.faseb.org/genetics/acmg/index.html ). This subcommittee also reviews the outcome of national proficiency testing in the genetics area and may choose to focus on specific diseases or methodologies in response to those results.