x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- exome sequencingRemove exome sequencing filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2013 and 2020.
Author
- Bale, Sherri J2
- Miller, David T2
- Adelman, Kathy1
- Bayrak-Toydemir, Pinar1
- Berg, Jonathan S1
- Brown, Kerry K1
- Chung, Wendy K1
- Deignan, Joshua L1
- Demmer, Laurie1
- Eng, Christine1
- Evans, James P1
- Friez, Michael J1
- Funke, Birgit H1
- Gannon, Jennifer1
- Hegde, Madhuri R1
- Herman, Gail E1
- Hickey, Scott E1
- Hufnagel, Sophia B1
- Kalia, Sarah S1
- Klein, Teri E1
- Korf, Bruce R1
- Lyon, Elaine1
- Malinowski, Jennifer1
- Martin, Christa L1
- McKelvey, Kent D1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
3 Results
- ACMG Systematic Evidence ReviewOpen Archive
Systematic evidence-based review: outcomes from exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability
Genetics in MedicineVol. 22Issue 6p986–1004Published in issue: June, 2020- Jennifer Malinowski
- David T. Miller
- Laurie Demmer
- Jennifer Gannon
- Elaine Maria Pereira
- Molly C. Schroeder
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 33Exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) are performed frequently in patients with congenital anomalies, developmental delay, or intellectual disability (CA/DD/ID), but the impact of results from ES/GS on clinical management and patient outcomes is not well characterized. A systematic evidence review (SER) can support future evidence-based guideline development for use of ES/GS in this patient population. - ACMG StatementOpen Archive
Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 19Issue 2p249–255Published in issue: February, 2017- Sarah S. Kalia
- Kathy Adelman
- Sherri J. Bale
- Wendy K. Chung
- Christine Eng
- James P. Evans
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1132Disclaimer: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical services. Adherence to these recommendations is completely voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. - ACMG Practice GuidelinesOpen Archive
ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 15Issue 9p733–747Published in issue: September, 2013- Heidi L. Rehm
- Sherri J. Bale
- Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir
- Jonathan S. Berg
- Kerry K. Brown
- Joshua L. Deignan
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 676Next-generation sequencing technologies have been and continue to be deployed in clinical laboratories, enabling rapid transformations in genomic medicine. These technologies have reduced the cost of large-scale sequencing by several orders of magnitude, and continuous advances are being made. It is now feasible to analyze an individual’s near-complete exome or genome to assist in the diagnosis of a wide array of clinical scenarios. Next-generation sequencing technologies are also facilitating further advances in therapeutic decision making and disease prediction for at-risk patients.