x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- Richards, Carolyn SueRemove Richards, Carolyn Sue filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2001 and 2022.
Author
- Desnick, Robert J2
- Grody, Wayne W2
- Maddalena, Anne2
- Watson, Michael S2
- Abul-Husn, Noura S1
- Allitto, Bernice1
- Amendola, Laura M1
- Amos, Jean1
- Bradley, Linda A1
- Brothers, Kyle1
- Brothman, Arthur1
- Chung, Wendy K1
- Cutting, Garry R1
- Gollob, Michael H1
- Gordon, Adam S1
- Grier, Robert E1
- Harrison, Steven M1
- Hershberger, Ray E1
- Hirsch, Betsy1
- Jacky, Peter1
- Klein, Teri E1
- Klinger, Katherine W1
- Lee, Kristy1
- Martin, Christa Lese1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
4 Results
- ACMG Statement
ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 24Issue 7p1407–1414Published online: June 17, 2022- David T. Miller
- Kristy Lee
- Noura S. Abul-Husn
- Laura M. Amendola
- Kyle Brothers
- Wendy K. Chung
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 21The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously published guidance for reporting secondary findings (SF) in the context of clinical exome and genome sequencing in 2013, 2017, and 2021.1-3 The ACMG Secondary Findings Working Group (SFWG) and Board of Directors (BOD) have agreed that the list of recommended genes should now be updated annually, but with an ongoing goal of maintaining this as a minimum list. Reporting of SF should be considered neither a replacement for indication-based diagnostic clinical genetic testing nor a form of population screening. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Standards and Guidelines for CFTR Mutation Testing
Genetics in MedicineVol. 4Issue 5p379–391Published in issue: September, 2002- Carolyn Sue Richards
- Linda A. Bradley
- Jean Amos
- Bernice Allitto
- Wayne W. Grody
- Anne Maddalena
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 107One mission of the ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance (QA) Committee is to develop standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, including cytogenetics, biochemical, and molecular genetics specialties. This document was developed under the auspices of the Molecular Subcommittee of the Laboratory QA Committee by the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Working Group. It was placed on the “fast track” to address the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical quality assurance practices of laboratories currently providing testing for CF. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Technical Standards and Guidelines for Fragile X: The First of a Series of Disease-Specific Supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical Genetics
Genetics in MedicineVol. 3Issue 3p200–205Published in issue: May, 2001- Anne Maddalena
- Carolyn Sue Richards
- Matthew J McGinniss
- Arthur Brothman
- Robert J Desnick
- Robert E Grier
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 205Preface: The Quality Assurance subcommittee of the ACMG Laboratory Practice committee has the mission of maintaining high technical standards for the performance and interpretation of genetic tests. In part, this is accomplished by the publication of the document “Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories,” which was published in its second edition in 1999 and is now maintained online (see http://www.faseb.org/genetics/acmg/index.html ). This subcommittee also reviews the outcome of national proficiency testing in the genetics area and may choose to focus on specific diseases or methodologies in response to those results. - ACMG Policy StatementOpen Archive
Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening
Genetics in MedicineVol. 3Issue 2p149–154Published in issue: March, 2001- Wayne W Grody
- Garry R Cutting
- Katherine W Klinger
- Carolyn Sue Richards
- Michael S Watson
- Robert J Desnick
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 394In 1997, the National Institutes of Health convened a Consensus Development Conference on Cystic Fibrosis (CF).1 The Consensus Conference recommended that genetic screening for CF mutations should be offered to identify carriers among adults with a positive family history of CF, partners of individuals with CF, couples currently planning a pregnancy, and couples seeking prenatal care. A second NIH-sponsored conference that focused on the implementation of the Consensus Conference recommendations was held in 1998.