x
Filter:
Filters applied
- ACMG Statements and Guidelines
- Andersen, Erica FRemove Andersen, Erica F filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2020 and 2021.
Author
- Thorland, Erik C3
- Aradhya, Swaroop2
- Cherry, Athena M2
- Kantarci, Sibel2
- Kearney, Hutton2
- Martin, Christa Lese2
- Patel, Ankita2
- Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel2
- Raca, Gordana2
- Riggs, Erin Rooney2
- Ritter, Deborah I2
- South, Sarah T2
- Brown, Teneille R1
- Gonzales, Patrick R1
- Horner, Vanessa L1
- Horwitz, Juli1
- On Behalf Of The ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee1
- Rehder, Catherine W1
- Robin, Nathaniel H1
- Rudy, Natasha L1
ACMG Statements and Guidelines
These online statements and guidelines are definitive and may be cited using the digital object identifier (DOI). These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetics services; they should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. Please refer to the leading disclaimer in each document for more information.
3 Results
- ACMG Technical StandardOpen Archive
Interpretation and reporting of large regions of homozygosity and suspected consanguinity/uniparental disomy, 2021 revision: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 24Issue 2p255–261Published online: December 3, 2021- Patrick R. Gonzales
- Erica F. Andersen
- Teneille R. Brown
- Vanessa L. Horner
- Juli Horwitz
- Catherine W. Rehder
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 2Genomic testing, including single-nucleotide variation (formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism)–based chromosomal microarray and exome and genome sequencing, can detect long regions of homozygosity (ROH) within the genome. Genomic testing can also detect possible uniparental disomy (UPD). Platforms that can detect ROH and possible UPD have matured since the initial American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) standard was published in 2013, and the detection of ROH and UPD by these platforms has shown utility in diagnosis of patients with genetic/genomic disorders. - CorrectionOpen Archive
Correction: Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 23Issue 11p2230Published in issue: November, 2021- Erin Rooney Riggs
- Erica F. Andersen
- Athena M. Cherry
- Sibel Kantarci
- Hutton Kearney
- Ankita Patel
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 8The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8 . - ACMG-Technical-StandardsOpen Archive
Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)
Genetics in MedicineVol. 22Issue 2p245–257Published in issue: February, 2020- Erin Rooney Riggs
- Erica F. Andersen
- Athena M. Cherry
- Sibel Kantarci
- Hutton Kearney
- Ankita Patel
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 498Copy-number analysis to detect disease-causing losses and gains across the genome is recommended for the evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies, as well as for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. In the decade that this analysis has been in widespread clinical use, tremendous strides have been made in understanding the effects of copy-number variants (CNVs) in both affected individuals and the general population. However, continued broad implementation of array and next-generation sequencing–based technologies will expand the types of CNVs encountered in the clinical setting, as well as our understanding of their impact on human health.